The Spreadsheet That Saved My Sanity

Let’s talk about timing—the most slippery, seductive, and ultimately useless word in most macro commentary.

If you’ve ever heard a macro analyst say something like:

“We’re entering a stagflationary regime…”

Or:

“Gold is setting up for a major move…”

But then fail to give any clear timeframe, you’re not alone.

That’s not insight. That’s intellectual performance art.

Let’s unpack why timing—when abused—is the biggest weasel word in investing, how to spot the difference between insightful and empty macro analysis, and who gives you something useful to work with.

Trend Without Timing = Commentary Without Consequence

Anyone can call a trend.

• “Inflation is coming.”
  
• “A crash is inevitable.”
  
• “Oil will break out.”
  
  

But without a timeframe? It’s worthless.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Eventually, everything happens.

So when someone says “gold is due to explode” without saying when, they’ve set up the perfect con:

• If gold goes up tomorrow: “Told you so.”
  
• If it goes down: “Just wait.”
  
• If it does nothing: “It’s building energy.”
  

That’s not forecasting. That’s marketing.

It’s commentator fraud—a way to sound smart without being held accountable.

Why This Happens (And How It Hurts You)

Macro is seductive because it deals in big ideas.

But big ideas without tactical timing are dangerous.

Why?

Because:

• You move too early and sit through pain.
  
• You move too late and miss the gain.
  
• Or worst of all—you don’t move at all.
  

Smart analysis without execution clarity leads to hesitation.

And in markets, hesitation = decay.

Following Is Harder (And More Useful) Than Predicting

There’s a harsh truth many macro commentators don’t admit:

Predicting trends is easier than trading them.

• Saying inflation might spike is easier than positioning for it early—and surviving the pain if you’re wrong.
  
• Saying the Fed will pivot eventually is easier than calling when, and what that means for your portfolio today.
  
  

The people who provide actual value aren’t the ones who predict the future.

They’re the ones who help you recognize when the future starts showing up.

Think of it like surfing.

“Surf’s up… sometime this week” is no help if you’re paddling out now.

You need someone who can say, “Look at the swell—get ready to catch the next wave.”

How to Sort the Helpful From the Headliners

So how do you tell who’s legit—and who’s just performing macro theater?

Here are a few filters that help:

• Do they timestamp their calls?
  If they say “recession incoming,” do they specify Q3 2025—or just leave it vague?
  
• Do they publish model portfolios or asset weightings?
  If they’re not willing to show how their view translates into action, skip them.
  
• Do they show track record, not just soundbites?
  Many macro accounts go viral with “charts that scare you.” But few show what happened next.
  
• Do they help you adapt—or just forecast?
  The best analysts help you respond, not just predict. They focus on risk management, positioning, and signals—not just grand theories.
  

So How Do You Forecast Without Fooling Yourself?

1. Follow Signals, Not Headlines

Headlines are lagging indicators.

Signals—like liquidity trends, rate movements, fiscal flows—tell you what’s coming.

Learn which indicators have predictive power in your time horizon.

Start simple:

• Real yields → where gold is likely heading
  
• ISM/PMI data → where cyclical sectors may go
  
• Credit spreads → risk-on vs risk-off environment
  
• Dollar strength → international risk appetite
  

The more you track these over time, the more you’ll learn how markets react to them—not just what they say.

2. Use “If–Then” Forecasting

Stop asking “what will happen?”

Start asking:

“If X happens, then Y is likely.”

Examples:

• “If CPI comes in hot, then bond yields rise, and long-duration tech sells off.”
  
• “If the Fed cuts while unemployment is low, gold likely rallies as real rates fall.”
  

This gives you conditional clarity, not false certainty.

3. Keep a Forecasting Journal

Track what you thought would happen, when, and why.

Then revisit it weekly or monthly.

Ask:

• Was I early or late?
  
• Did I act or freeze?
  
• Was my reasoning sound—even if the outcome wasn’t?
  

This builds forecasting muscle over time.

You stop being a passive consumer of macro narratives and become an active observer of your own decision-making.

4. Use Time Windows, Not Dates

No one knows the exact week things will flip.

But you can estimate windows of risk/reward.

Instead of saying, “There will be a recession in Q3,” say:

“The window for rising recession risk opens between Q3 and Q4 if these conditions persist.”

This way, you give yourself room to observe and act with flexibility—not panic when it doesn’t land on your calendar.

5. Use Probabilities, Not Absolutes

Markets run on odds, not certainties.

Instead of “rates will fall,” say:

“There’s a 70% chance the Fed cuts by September if unemployment ticks up again.”

This mindset keeps you adaptive.

You’ll adjust with new information rather than cling to a dead thesis.

6. Plan With Frameworks, Act With Discipline

The best investors don’t guess better.

They react better.

Build a framework that reflects your macro views—but implement it with predefined rules.

• Rebalance when your asset weights drift 5-10%
  
• Shift allocations if liquidity conditions or yield curves change
  
• Reduce exposure when downside probability > upside payoff
  

This lets you stay macro-aware without overtrading or overthinking.

It’s Easy to Get Lost So Keep It Simple

There are countless macro voices and data points. You can drown in them.

What matters is how you use them.

Don’t aim to be the most informed investor.

Aim to be the most prepared.

• Prepared to act when signals align
  
• Prepared to wait when things are unclear
  
• Prepared to review and revise when you’re wrong
  

That’s what separates a strategist from a spectator.

Final Thought: Time Is a Tool, Not a Trap

The irony?

Timing does matter.

But only when used responsibly.

• It matters when you rebalance.
  
• It matters when macro signals shift.
  
• It matters when risk/reward becomes asymmetric.
  

But it’s useless when wielded as a vague shield for bad forecasting.

The best investors don’t try to predict exactly when something will happen.

They stay close to the signals.

They track the data.

They know that conviction plus patience beats prediction every time.

📈 Want a portfolio that responds to macro signals instead of gambling on timing?

→ Book a call with Dakota Ridge Capital

Want to surround yourself with other clear-eyed investors?

→ Join the Fearless Investor Community

‍