HomeRight AerrowInsightsSepratorMacroMashupSeparator
MacroMashup— Annual 2025 Macro Brief
MacroMashup Newsletter

MacroMashup— Annual 2025 Macro Brief

What 2025 clarified — and what investors must carry forward into 2026

Dec 26, 2025
Neil Winward

Author:

Neil Winward

|

Founder and CEO

of

Dakota Ridge Capital

Book a free energy consultation

here
    MacroMashup— Annual 2025 Macro Brief
    Get our weekly MacroMashup newsletters.
    Thank you! Your submission has been received!
    Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

    Welcome to MacroMashup—your weekly briefing on the real forces driving markets beneath the headlines. If you want disciplined macro analysis, portfolio frameworks, and real-world capital insights, subscribe to receive every deep dive.

    2025 was the year the macro narrative stopped being theoretical and started reshaping portfolios.

    Energy constraints became investment realities. AI’s infrastructure demands materialized. Geopolitical fragmentation stopped being a tail risk and became a structural feature. And the Federal Reserve’s familiar playbook proved far less effective than many expected.

    But the most important development of 2025 wasn’t a single call or market move.

    It was a shift in how markets respond.

    Markets became less responsive to forecasts, guidance, and clean narratives — and more responsive to capacity, constraints, and balance-sheet realities. Investors who adjusted their mental models early felt calmer by year-end. Those who didn’t often felt increasingly reactive, even as information became more abundant.

    This Annual Macro Brief is not a prediction for 2026.

    It’s a reset.

    It lays out what 2025 clarified, which assumptions quietly expired, and how investors should approach the year ahead with stronger orientation, better decision discipline, and fewer narrative-driven mistakes.

    Why 2025 Was a Clarifying Year (Not a Volatile One)

    Many investors will remember 2025 as noisy.

    Rates moved. Markets chopped. Narratives rotated quickly. At times, it felt like nothing stuck long enough to trust.

    That interpretation misses the point.

    2025 wasn’t defined by instability. It was defined by disillusionment — the quiet removal of assumptions investors had been carrying forward from the prior decade.

    Markets didn’t behave irrationally. They behaved selectively.

    Some signals stopped working.

    Some reassurance stopped landing.

    Some explanations stopped producing follow-through.

    What felt confusing was actually a sorting process.

    Markets were clarifying what still matters, what matters less, and what no longer works at all.

    What 2025 Made Clear (That Markets Now Price)

    The most important lesson of 2025 wasn’t about growth or inflation levels.

    It was about responsiveness.

    Markets became less responsive to:

    • Policy signaling
    • Forward guidance
    • Consensus optimism
    • Clean narratives

    And more responsive to:

    • Capacity
    • Constraints
    • Balance-sheet realities
    • Physical and political limits

    This explains why “good news” often failed to extend rallies — and why “bad news” sometimes barely moved prices.

    Three clarifications stood out.

    First, inflation behavior mattered more than inflation prints.

    Markets stopped reacting to month-to-month fluctuations and focused instead on persistence, stickiness, and second-order effects.

    Second, policy intent mattered less than policy capacity.

    What central banks wanted to do mattered less than what they could do without triggering unintended consequences.

    Third, liquidity mattered more than narratives.

    When liquidity tightened, markets became less forgiving regardless of the story attached to it.

    Assets closer to the edge of the ‘circulatory system’—Bitcoin—suffered most.

    None of this happened suddenly. Markets priced it quietly.

    What 2025 Quietly Removed From the Investor Playbook

    Some assumptions didn’t weaken in 2025. They expired.

    One was the belief that liquidity backstops are automatic. Intervention now comes with trade-offs, delays, and political constraints.

    Another was the idea that diversification always reduces risk. Correlations rose when it mattered most, and complexity often hid fragility rather than reducing it.

    Perhaps most importantly, 2025 challenged the belief that waiting for clarity is a viable strategy. By the time clarity arrived, markets had often already moved.

    These removals created discomfort — because they didn’t come with immediate replacements.

    But those gaps also created opportunity for investors willing to update their frameworks.

    The Five Dominant Macro Themes of 2025

    1. The AI Energy Imperative: Power Became the Bottleneck

    AI’s computational demands turned energy infrastructure into critical investment terrain. The winners weren’t just software companies — they were those controlling power generation, transmission, and reliability.

    2025 takeaway: Energy stocks outperformed tech late in the year. Companies solving AI’s power problem gained pricing power.

    2026 implication: The AI trade is now an energy trade.

    2. The Death of the “Work” Metric

    Traditional labor statistics broke down. Work continued. Productivity surged. Jobs disappeared from official measures.

    Markets stopped reacting to employment prints and focused instead on margins, productivity, and automation.

    2026 implication: Watch productivity, profit margins, and capex — not headline employment data.

    3. The Commodity Reset

    Commodities stopped acting like cyclical hedges and started behaving like structural growth assets.

    Gold and silver reflected monetary debasement and central bank diversification. Copper, uranium, and critical minerals became national security issues.

    2026 implication: Commodities belong in portfolios as growth positions, not just protection.

    4. Geopolitical Fragmentation Accelerated

    The post–Cold War order continued to unwind. Globalization gave way to regionalization. Supply-chain sovereignty became policy priority.

    2026 implication: Favor regional resilience over global efficiency.

    5. The K-Shaped Reality Deepened

    Asset owners continued to win. Labor lagged. Scarce assets outperformed. Broad averages masked widening dispersion.

    2026 implication: Quality, scarcity, and conviction matter more than broad exposure.

    A Shift in How We Think About 2026

    Before laying out actions, it’s worth addressing something directly.

    The biggest upgrade heading into 2026 isn’t a new theme — it’s a new level of rigor in decision-making.

    2025 reminded us of a simple truth: good outcomes don’t always mean good decisions, and bad outcomes don’t always mean bad ones.

    That distinction matters.

    Inspired by the principles outlined in Thinking in Bets (Annie Dukes), MacroMashup is placing greater emphasis on:

    • Decision quality over outcome chasing
    • Explicit recognition of uncertainty
    • Bias awareness and probabilistic thinking
    • Reviewing calls with discipline, not ego

    The goal isn’t to sound more cautious. It’s to be more accountable.

    That shift — toward clearer frameworks, stress-tested assumptions, and shared learning — is the foundation of what’s coming in 2026.

    The Constraints That Define 2026

    Entering 2026, markets are anchored to constraints that move slowly and matter deeply:

    • Energy capacity remains a physical reality
    • Debt and fiscal flexibility limit policy choices
    • Labor and demographics cap growth potential
    • Geopolitical fragmentation increases friction
    • The cost of capital is no longer negligible

    These aren’t forecasts. They’re boundaries.

    Markets don’t debate them. They work around them.

    2026 Action Plan: Five Moves for the Year Ahead

    1. Build Energy Infrastructure Exposure

    Natural gas midstream, nuclear, grid modernization, and AI-adjacent power infrastructure.

    Why: AI’s energy demands are non-negotiable.

    How: ~15–20% of growth allocation.

    2. Increase Commodity Exposure Structurally

    Gold, copper, uranium, and critical materials.

    Why: Structural demand meets constrained supply.

    How: Favor physical exposure and quality producers.

    3. Focus on AI’s Second-Order Beneficiaries

    Not Nvidia — but the companies serving Nvidia’s customers.

    Why: Second-order effects are less crowded.

    How: Automation, infrastructure, and productivity enablers.

    4. Embrace the K-Shaped Reality

    Scarce assets over broad exposure.

    Why: Dispersion persists.

    How: Concentration in highest-conviction positions.

    5. Prepare for Shocks — Don’t Trade Them

    Volatility will rise. Structural trends remain.

    Why: Headlines exaggerate noise.

    How: Maintain dry powder. Execute the plan.

    What to Stop Doing in 2026

    • Stop trading Fed announcements
    • Stop chasing “cheap” value without structural support
    • Stop diversifying for comfort rather than resilience
    • Stop waiting for “normal” to return

    Volatility is the baseline.

    Macro Mashup: Deep-Dive Insights, Weekly

    Macro Mashup is where we go deeper, every week.

    It’s a weekly deep dive into the forces shaping markets right now — macroeconomics, energy, geopolitics, capital flows, and policy — with an emphasis on what actually matters versus what simply dominates headlines.

    Subscribers receive:

    • Weekly deep-dive analysis
    • Clear frameworks to interpret current events
    • Context that helps you avoid narrative-driven decisions

    If you want to start the year oriented instead of reactive, this is the best place to begin.

    macromashup.com

    Already Reading Macro Mashup? Explore Fearless Investor

    If you’re already subscribed to Macro Mashup, our sister publication, Fearless Investor, takes a complementary approach.

    Fearless Investor focuses on:

    • Portfolio strategy and allocation
    • Behavioral finance and decision-making
    • Practical systems and tools for DIY investors

    It’s less about what’s happening out there — and more about how to structure decisions and portfolios in response.

    Many readers follow both because together they cover:

    • Macro context (Macro Mashup)
    • Investor behavior, strategy, and systems (Fearless Investor)

    If you haven’t explored Fearless Investor yet, it’s worth a look.

    Continue reading here →

    https://open.substack.com/pub/fearlessinvestor

    Final Thought

    2025 clarified something essential:

    The old rules didn’t break overnight — they stopped compounding.

    Energy determines AI winners.

    Commodities determine energy winners.

    Geopolitics determines access.

    Automation determines survival.

    The through-line is scarcity.

    Your 2026 portfolio shouldn’t answer what you think will happen next.

    It should answer what becomes more valuable as the world fragments, electrifies, and automates.

    That’s where durable returns come from.

    Get Involved

    MacroMashup paid members receive full weekly deep dives, portfolio frameworks, and early access to investor-grade analysis. If you want to understand how liquidity, policy, and capital structure actually shape returns, subscribe today. 

    macromashup.com 

    Already subscribed? Enjoy this week’s deep dive!

    Help others learn, click to share
      Neil Winward

      Neil Winward is the founding partner of Dakota Ridge Captial, helping investors, developers, banks, non-profits, and family offices unlock massive tax savings - on average of 7%- 10% - via clean energy investments by fully leveraging U.S. government incentives such the Inflation Reduction Act.

      BOOK A CALL

      READY TO TAKE ACTION ON YOUR ENERGY PROJECT? BOOK A COMPLIMENTARY, ZERO-OBLIGATION CONSULTATION TO SEE HOW WE CAN HELP YOU.

      Book Here
      vectorvector
      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI

      Neil Winward

      Why capital misprices time-based energy constraints in the age of exponential compute.

      In 1980, Julian Simon made one of the most famous bets in economic history.

      He bet that human ingenuity would defeat scarcity.

      Paul Ehrlich bet the opposite.

      Simon won.

      Commodity prices fell.

      Technology advanced.

      Supply responded.

      The lesson became doctrine:

      When prices rise, markets fix shortages.

      That belief now underpins trillions of dollars in capital allocation.

      It also underpins the AI boom.

      But here’s the question investors are not asking:

      What happens when prices can’t fix the bottleneck?

      This week, we’re not debating AI.

      We’re not debating energy transition.

      We’re not debating scarcity narratives.

      We’re examining something deeper:

      When does the price mechanism stop working — and what does that mean for portfolio construction?

      Inside this issue:

      • Where Simon still works
      • Where the mechanism slows
      • Where it structurally fails
      • And how to allocate when constraint becomes time-based, not price-based

      Because in 2026, the edge is not identifying demand.

      It’s identifying where capital hits physical delay.

      Continue reading for the full allocator framework.

      Read More
      When Bridges Become Collateral
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      When Bridges Become Collateral

      Neil Winward

      The Yen Carry Wobbles, China Steps Back, and Sovereign Duration Stops Feeling Frictionless

      Welcome to MacroMashup — where we track the plumbing beneath the headlines.

      We focus on funding markets, sovereign balance sheets, and the structural flows that determine which assets become collateral — and which become narratives.

      If you’re new here, subscribe for weekly macro breakdowns that connect policy, capital flows, and portfolio positioning — before the consequences become obvious.

      Calm Surface, Cracked Foundations

      This week’s macro tape looks calm on the surface.

      The Fed is in blackout mode, parked at 3.50–3.75%. No new dot plot. No press conference shock. Just a steady drip of inflation and labor data for markets to over-interpret.

      There is good and bad in the delayed non-farm payrolls numbers:

      • Good enough to push back on imminent recession/hard-landing narratives (headline beat, unemployment down, participation up).
      • Not good enough to erase the story of a materially cooled labor market once you incorporate the 2025 revisions (-900k) and very narrow sector leadership.
      • For markets: bullish for near-term risk sentiment vs "jobs scare" scenarios, but mildly bearish for front-end duration versus hopes of rapid cuts, with a tilt toward a slow-grind softening rather than a cliff.
      • January is a volatile month, and not that reliable.

      Equities rotate instead of breaking, though the AI scare continues to create anxiety at the white-collar end. The market is beginning to try picking winners and losers.

      The 10-year chops around.

      Nobody says they’re de-risking — but positioning keeps getting tighter.

      Then geopolitics delivers peak 2026 energy: a political standoff over a literal bridge.

      The Gordie Howe International Bridge — one of the most important trade crossings between Detroit and Windsor — is now a bargaining chip. The White House is threatening to block its opening unless the U.S. gets a “better deal,” up to and including revisiting permits.

      When a concrete span becomes leverage, you’re being reminded of something bigger:

      Critical infrastructure is no longer sacred.

      It’s collateral.

      Under the surface, the real story isn’t about bridges.

      It’s about who funds what — and who stops funding it.

      In this week’s Deep Dive for paid readers, we examine:

      • Why the yen carry trade just lost its training wheels
      • Why Japan’s bond market is no longer “sleepy”
      • Why China is quietly telling banks to temper Treasury exposure
      • And what happens when sovereign duration stops feeling frictionless

      Bitcoin bled lower this week, behaving less like digital gold and more like a liquidity-sensitive risk asset. Hard assets are beginning to diverge — some are collateral, some are narrative.

      The system is quietly repricing the difference.

      Read More
      Global Energy: Narrative vs. Reality
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      Global Energy: Narrative vs. Reality

      Neil Winward

      Markets price stories. Energy prices physics. MacroMashup cuts through hype, coal reality, policy, and capital flows.

      Welcome to MacroMashup

      A systems-level briefing on markets, energy, geopolitics, and capital flows.

      MacroMashup is not a news recap.

      We don’t chase headlines, hot takes, or moral theater. We focus on constraints — the physical, financial, and political limits that actually shape markets before narratives catch up.

      Each edition connects:

      • Macro policy and market structure
      • Energy, infrastructure, and industrial reality
      • Capital flows across assets, regions, and regimes

      The goal isn’t prediction.

      It’s orientation — so you can see regime shifts forming while others are still arguing about stories.

      If you’re new here, start with the free section below.

      👉 Subscribe to MacroMashup to receive:

      • Weekly free macro briefings
      • Member-only deep dives into energy, policy, and capital allocation
      • Private audio notes framing how to read the week calmly

      Paid members get the full analysis, charts, and portfolio-level implications.

      Markets are trading stories. Energy is trading physics.

      The Fed met this week with one objective: don’t spook anyone.

      Policy remains nominally unchanged. The language is softer. Powell is stuck in the narrow corridor where inflation isn’t dead, growth isn’t dead — but political tolerance for pain very much is. The only thing reporters really wanted to talk about wasn’t policy at all. It was politics…

      And, it was succession.

      Rick Rieder at BlackRock is now widely seen as the front-runner to replace Powell, a signal that markets are already gaming the next regime rather than listening to the current one.

      Equities keep floating higher for the same reason they’ve been floating all year: relative attractiveness. Compared to everything else on the menu, stocks still look like the least-ugly chaos hedge.

      The real tell isn’t in equities.

      It’s in shiny rocks.

      • Gold north of $5,000 and silver above $110 isn’t about CPI prints. It’s about trust.
      • Central banks keep accumulating quietly.
      • Retail is finally noticing.
      • And silver’s industrial role in AI, solar, and electrification is turning a “store of value” into a supply-chain bottleneck.

      Meanwhile, Minnesota has become the unwilling focal point of America’s immigration psychodrama.

      The killing of Alex Pretti — an ICU nurse and U.S. citizen — by federal immigration officers in Minneapolis detonated a narrative shift. After video evidence dismantled the initial “terrorist” framing, the administration pivoted fast: reviews announced, Tom Homan dispatched, language softened.

      State officials are suing. Judges are weighing restraining orders. Even some Republicans are blinking at the optics.

      Layer in South Korea slow-rolling U.S. investment commitments — and getting tariff threats in response — and you’re watching an administration try to be pro-market, pro-tariff, tough on immigration, and allergic to viral video all at once.

      Then there’s industrial policy.

      Washington just wrote another check into the rare-earths casino: up to $277 million in direct support, plus a potential $1.3 billion in additional backing for USA Rare Earth — in exchange for equity and warrants. Venture logic, sovereign balance sheet.

      So where does that leave us?

      Here’s the MacroMashup snapshot:

      • Macro regime: shifting from “central banks in charge” to “fiscal math in charge.” Bond markets are slowly realizing they’re financing deficits politics won’t fix.
      • Policy reality: the tightening narrative is over. De-facto gradual monetization is in. Structurally negative real rates remain the path of least resistance.
      • Asset implications:
        • Tailwinds for hard assets, energy, commodities, and durable cash-flow businesses
        • Bitcoin should benefit eventually — but hasn’t yet
        • Headwinds for long-duration paper claims dependent on stable real yields
      • Market behavior:
        • Mega-caps and Treasuries can levitate on flows and AI narratives
        • Breadth is improving beneath the Mag 7
        • Volatility shocks are becoming a feature, not a bug
      • Capital rotation: slow but real movement away from concentrated U.S. duration risk toward:
        • Energy and commodities
        • Geographically diversified real assets
        • Balance sheets built for financial repression, not perfection

      That’s the surface.

      Now let’s dig into where the energy story breaks down — and why the narrative no longer matches the operating system.

      Read More
      Sustainable energy project investment
      IRA Report To Smarter Investing
      Unlock the Opportunities of the Inflation Reduction Act!​ Are you ready to stay ahead in today's shifting economic landscape? Our comprehensive white paper breaks down the Inflation Reduction Act and reveals the key benefits, incentives, and strategies your business needs to capitalize on. Learn how to optimize your financial planning, leverage tax credits, and position your company for sustainable growth.
      Pre-order now to get the insights and actionable steps that can give your business a competitive edge.
      New Version Release Date: 12/10/2024
      Thank you! Your submission has been received!
      Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
      Close icon