HomeRight AerrowInsightsSepratorMacroMashupSeparator
MacroMashup— Annual 2025 Macro Brief
MacroMashup Newsletter

MacroMashup— Annual 2025 Macro Brief

What 2025 clarified — and what investors must carry forward into 2026

Dec 26, 2025
Neil Winward

Author:

Neil Winward

|

Founder and CEO

of

Dakota Ridge Capital

Book a free energy consultation

here
    MacroMashup— Annual 2025 Macro Brief
    Get our weekly MacroMashup newsletters.
    Thank you! Your submission has been received!
    Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

    Welcome to MacroMashup—your weekly briefing on the real forces driving markets beneath the headlines. If you want disciplined macro analysis, portfolio frameworks, and real-world capital insights, subscribe to receive every deep dive.

    2025 was the year the macro narrative stopped being theoretical and started reshaping portfolios.

    Energy constraints became investment realities. AI’s infrastructure demands materialized. Geopolitical fragmentation stopped being a tail risk and became a structural feature. And the Federal Reserve’s familiar playbook proved far less effective than many expected.

    But the most important development of 2025 wasn’t a single call or market move.

    It was a shift in how markets respond.

    Markets became less responsive to forecasts, guidance, and clean narratives — and more responsive to capacity, constraints, and balance-sheet realities. Investors who adjusted their mental models early felt calmer by year-end. Those who didn’t often felt increasingly reactive, even as information became more abundant.

    This Annual Macro Brief is not a prediction for 2026.

    It’s a reset.

    It lays out what 2025 clarified, which assumptions quietly expired, and how investors should approach the year ahead with stronger orientation, better decision discipline, and fewer narrative-driven mistakes.

    Why 2025 Was a Clarifying Year (Not a Volatile One)

    Many investors will remember 2025 as noisy.

    Rates moved. Markets chopped. Narratives rotated quickly. At times, it felt like nothing stuck long enough to trust.

    That interpretation misses the point.

    2025 wasn’t defined by instability. It was defined by disillusionment — the quiet removal of assumptions investors had been carrying forward from the prior decade.

    Markets didn’t behave irrationally. They behaved selectively.

    Some signals stopped working.

    Some reassurance stopped landing.

    Some explanations stopped producing follow-through.

    What felt confusing was actually a sorting process.

    Markets were clarifying what still matters, what matters less, and what no longer works at all.

    What 2025 Made Clear (That Markets Now Price)

    The most important lesson of 2025 wasn’t about growth or inflation levels.

    It was about responsiveness.

    Markets became less responsive to:

    • Policy signaling
    • Forward guidance
    • Consensus optimism
    • Clean narratives

    And more responsive to:

    • Capacity
    • Constraints
    • Balance-sheet realities
    • Physical and political limits

    This explains why “good news” often failed to extend rallies — and why “bad news” sometimes barely moved prices.

    Three clarifications stood out.

    First, inflation behavior mattered more than inflation prints.

    Markets stopped reacting to month-to-month fluctuations and focused instead on persistence, stickiness, and second-order effects.

    Second, policy intent mattered less than policy capacity.

    What central banks wanted to do mattered less than what they could do without triggering unintended consequences.

    Third, liquidity mattered more than narratives.

    When liquidity tightened, markets became less forgiving regardless of the story attached to it.

    Assets closer to the edge of the ‘circulatory system’—Bitcoin—suffered most.

    None of this happened suddenly. Markets priced it quietly.

    What 2025 Quietly Removed From the Investor Playbook

    Some assumptions didn’t weaken in 2025. They expired.

    One was the belief that liquidity backstops are automatic. Intervention now comes with trade-offs, delays, and political constraints.

    Another was the idea that diversification always reduces risk. Correlations rose when it mattered most, and complexity often hid fragility rather than reducing it.

    Perhaps most importantly, 2025 challenged the belief that waiting for clarity is a viable strategy. By the time clarity arrived, markets had often already moved.

    These removals created discomfort — because they didn’t come with immediate replacements.

    But those gaps also created opportunity for investors willing to update their frameworks.

    The Five Dominant Macro Themes of 2025

    1. The AI Energy Imperative: Power Became the Bottleneck

    AI’s computational demands turned energy infrastructure into critical investment terrain. The winners weren’t just software companies — they were those controlling power generation, transmission, and reliability.

    2025 takeaway: Energy stocks outperformed tech late in the year. Companies solving AI’s power problem gained pricing power.

    2026 implication: The AI trade is now an energy trade.

    2. The Death of the “Work” Metric

    Traditional labor statistics broke down. Work continued. Productivity surged. Jobs disappeared from official measures.

    Markets stopped reacting to employment prints and focused instead on margins, productivity, and automation.

    2026 implication: Watch productivity, profit margins, and capex — not headline employment data.

    3. The Commodity Reset

    Commodities stopped acting like cyclical hedges and started behaving like structural growth assets.

    Gold and silver reflected monetary debasement and central bank diversification. Copper, uranium, and critical minerals became national security issues.

    2026 implication: Commodities belong in portfolios as growth positions, not just protection.

    4. Geopolitical Fragmentation Accelerated

    The post–Cold War order continued to unwind. Globalization gave way to regionalization. Supply-chain sovereignty became policy priority.

    2026 implication: Favor regional resilience over global efficiency.

    5. The K-Shaped Reality Deepened

    Asset owners continued to win. Labor lagged. Scarce assets outperformed. Broad averages masked widening dispersion.

    2026 implication: Quality, scarcity, and conviction matter more than broad exposure.

    A Shift in How We Think About 2026

    Before laying out actions, it’s worth addressing something directly.

    The biggest upgrade heading into 2026 isn’t a new theme — it’s a new level of rigor in decision-making.

    2025 reminded us of a simple truth: good outcomes don’t always mean good decisions, and bad outcomes don’t always mean bad ones.

    That distinction matters.

    Inspired by the principles outlined in Thinking in Bets (Annie Dukes), MacroMashup is placing greater emphasis on:

    • Decision quality over outcome chasing
    • Explicit recognition of uncertainty
    • Bias awareness and probabilistic thinking
    • Reviewing calls with discipline, not ego

    The goal isn’t to sound more cautious. It’s to be more accountable.

    That shift — toward clearer frameworks, stress-tested assumptions, and shared learning — is the foundation of what’s coming in 2026.

    The Constraints That Define 2026

    Entering 2026, markets are anchored to constraints that move slowly and matter deeply:

    • Energy capacity remains a physical reality
    • Debt and fiscal flexibility limit policy choices
    • Labor and demographics cap growth potential
    • Geopolitical fragmentation increases friction
    • The cost of capital is no longer negligible

    These aren’t forecasts. They’re boundaries.

    Markets don’t debate them. They work around them.

    2026 Action Plan: Five Moves for the Year Ahead

    1. Build Energy Infrastructure Exposure

    Natural gas midstream, nuclear, grid modernization, and AI-adjacent power infrastructure.

    Why: AI’s energy demands are non-negotiable.

    How: ~15–20% of growth allocation.

    2. Increase Commodity Exposure Structurally

    Gold, copper, uranium, and critical materials.

    Why: Structural demand meets constrained supply.

    How: Favor physical exposure and quality producers.

    3. Focus on AI’s Second-Order Beneficiaries

    Not Nvidia — but the companies serving Nvidia’s customers.

    Why: Second-order effects are less crowded.

    How: Automation, infrastructure, and productivity enablers.

    4. Embrace the K-Shaped Reality

    Scarce assets over broad exposure.

    Why: Dispersion persists.

    How: Concentration in highest-conviction positions.

    5. Prepare for Shocks — Don’t Trade Them

    Volatility will rise. Structural trends remain.

    Why: Headlines exaggerate noise.

    How: Maintain dry powder. Execute the plan.

    What to Stop Doing in 2026

    • Stop trading Fed announcements
    • Stop chasing “cheap” value without structural support
    • Stop diversifying for comfort rather than resilience
    • Stop waiting for “normal” to return

    Volatility is the baseline.

    Macro Mashup: Deep-Dive Insights, Weekly

    Macro Mashup is where we go deeper, every week.

    It’s a weekly deep dive into the forces shaping markets right now — macroeconomics, energy, geopolitics, capital flows, and policy — with an emphasis on what actually matters versus what simply dominates headlines.

    Subscribers receive:

    • Weekly deep-dive analysis
    • Clear frameworks to interpret current events
    • Context that helps you avoid narrative-driven decisions

    If you want to start the year oriented instead of reactive, this is the best place to begin.

    macromashup.com

    Already Reading Macro Mashup? Explore Fearless Investor

    If you’re already subscribed to Macro Mashup, our sister publication, Fearless Investor, takes a complementary approach.

    Fearless Investor focuses on:

    • Portfolio strategy and allocation
    • Behavioral finance and decision-making
    • Practical systems and tools for DIY investors

    It’s less about what’s happening out there — and more about how to structure decisions and portfolios in response.

    Many readers follow both because together they cover:

    • Macro context (Macro Mashup)
    • Investor behavior, strategy, and systems (Fearless Investor)

    If you haven’t explored Fearless Investor yet, it’s worth a look.

    Continue reading here →

    https://open.substack.com/pub/fearlessinvestor

    Final Thought

    2025 clarified something essential:

    The old rules didn’t break overnight — they stopped compounding.

    Energy determines AI winners.

    Commodities determine energy winners.

    Geopolitics determines access.

    Automation determines survival.

    The through-line is scarcity.

    Your 2026 portfolio shouldn’t answer what you think will happen next.

    It should answer what becomes more valuable as the world fragments, electrifies, and automates.

    That’s where durable returns come from.

    Get Involved

    MacroMashup paid members receive full weekly deep dives, portfolio frameworks, and early access to investor-grade analysis. If you want to understand how liquidity, policy, and capital structure actually shape returns, subscribe today. 

    macromashup.com 

    Already subscribed? Enjoy this week’s deep dive!

    Help others learn, click to share
      Neil Winward

      Neil Winward is the founding partner of Dakota Ridge Captial, helping investors, developers, banks, non-profits, and family offices unlock massive tax savings - on average of 7%- 10% - via clean energy investments by fully leveraging U.S. government incentives such the Inflation Reduction Act.

      BOOK A CALL

      READY TO TAKE ACTION ON YOUR ENERGY PROJECT? BOOK A COMPLIMENTARY, ZERO-OBLIGATION CONSULTATION TO SEE HOW WE CAN HELP YOU.

      Book Here
      vectorvector
      The Queue: Where AI’s Grid Constraint Gets Real
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      The Queue: Where AI’s Grid Constraint Gets Real

      Neil Winward

      This week’s MacroMashup deep dive examines one of the least discussed datasets in macro markets: The US interconnection queue. More than 2,300 gigawatts of power generation are currently waiting to connect to the grid.

      MacroMashup Research Summary

      Core Thesis

      Markets are obsessed with AI chips.

      But the real constraint may be electricity.

      The US interconnection queue has become the chokepoint of American electricity expansion. Roughly 2,300 gigawatts of generation capacity are currently waiting to connect to a grid that operates at about 1,200 gigawatts today.

      Why It Matters

      AI infrastructure, electrification, and energy transition all depend on grid access. Interconnection delays now stretch three to six years in several regions, creating the first major bottleneck in the next wave of electricity demand.

      Key Data

      • 2,300 GW waiting in US interconnection queues. These projects include solar, wind, battery storage, natural gas, and other generation technologies.

      • Only ~13% of projects entering the queue ultimately complete

      • Median wait times approaching five years in several regions

      • Demand pressure ratios exceeding 5× in ERCOT

      Market Signals

      The queue is becoming a leading indicator for:

      • electricity price pressure

      • utility capex cycles

      • natural gas demand

      • regional AI infrastructure migration

      AI models scale at software speed.

      Electricity infrastructure expands at infrastructure speed.

      The Signal

      This Week’s Dashboard

      It’s all about the barrel.

      Oil dominated nearly every signal this week. Brent crude rallied from roughly $82 to $88, while WTI followed closely, settling near $85. The Strait of Hormuz remains the transmission mechanism: tanker transits have collapsed from roughly 24 per day to single digits since the conflict began, and every headline about the Strait is now moving assets across the macro dashboard.

      Gold was caught in the crossfire. When oil spikes, the dollar typically strengthens on safe-haven flows and higher yields raise the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Gold sold off from its late-February highs before stabilizing this week as the dollar softened again. Central bank buying remains the structural floor, but in the short term the dollar and the 10-year yield are driving the tape.

      The information war intensified as well. President Trump posted that the conflict was “very complete, pretty much.” Netanyahu responded with a new wave of strikes on Tehran. Iran apologized to the UAE after collateral damage from retaliatory drone strikes — and then continued launching them.

      At one point the White House deleted a social media post claiming the US Navy had escorted a tanker through the Strait of Hormuz after confirming no such escort had occurred. Oil briefly dropped on the headline before rebounding.

      Meanwhile the IEA proposed the largest strategic petroleum reserve release in its history. Pipeline alternatives are suddenly receiving attention, and the market is attempting to price the difference between a four-week war and a four-month one — a distinction worth tens of dollars per barrel.

      Equities barely reacted. The S&P finished the week essentially flat at ~6,781. Credit spreads widened modestly but remain far from pricing sustained economic damage.

      Either the market is right.

      Or it hasn’t caught up yet.

      But the most important constraint shaping the next phase of this cycle may not be geopolitical.

      It may be structural.

      Because the next phase of the global economy will run on electricity.

      The Real Constraint Behind the AI Boom

      Last week we introduced the idea that AI’s real constraint may not be software.

      It may be electricity.

      This intersection between AI infrastructure and electricity systems is becoming one of the most important macro stories of the next decade.

      are launching AI Grid Report, a new research publication focused on the intersection of AI infrastructure, electricity systems, and energy markets.

      The first issues will examine how the global AI buildout could reshape electricity demand, natural gas markets, and power infrastructure investment.

      If you’re interested in how the power grid may shape the next phase of the AI economy, you can preview the project here:

      https://open.substack.com/pub/theaigridreport

      The first issues will be launching soon.

      🔒 Deep Dive for Members

      Read More
      From Hormuz to the Grid: The Chokepoints That Matter
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      From Hormuz to the Grid: The Chokepoints That Matter

      Neil Winward

      Markets are modeling AI disruption at software speed. But electricity infrastructure may determine how fast the real economy can absorb it.

      Welcome to MacroMashup. We focus on constraints, not forecasts. Market structure, not vibes. Capital flows, leverage, and incentives—where things actually break.

      The week’s dominant story is geopolitical.

      U.S.–Israeli strikes on Iran. Retaliation spreading across the region. The Strait of Hormuz effectively closed. Markets scrambling to price the energy shock.

      But beneath the geopolitical noise, another question is taking shape as Anthropic and OpenAI wrestle with the Department of War over the role AI will play.

      The question is not whether AI can transform the economy and the battlefield—it already has— but how fast.

      Because AI runs on compute. And compute runs on power.

      The constraint shaping the next phase of the AI cycle may not be technological progress.

      It may be the infrastructure required to supply electricity fast enough.

      In this week’s MacroMashup deep dive, we examine:

      • why AI adoption may move at infrastructure speed rather than software speed

      • how grid constraints could shape the timeline of economic disruption

      • why energy infrastructure may become the leverage point of the AI economy

      A look at this week’s dashboard tells the story of which chokepoint is throttling harder.

      If you want to understand the structural constraints shaping global markets, join the MacroMashup community.

      Subscribe for weekly briefings examining the forces behind the next economic cycle.

      Read More
      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI

      Neil Winward

      Why capital misprices time-based energy constraints in the age of exponential compute.

      In 1980, Julian Simon made one of the most famous bets in economic history.

      He bet that human ingenuity would defeat scarcity.

      Paul Ehrlich bet the opposite.

      Simon won.

      Commodity prices fell.

      Technology advanced.

      Supply responded.

      The lesson became doctrine:

      When prices rise, markets fix shortages.

      That belief now underpins trillions of dollars in capital allocation.

      It also underpins the AI boom.

      But here’s the question investors are not asking:

      What happens when prices can’t fix the bottleneck?

      This week, we’re not debating AI.

      We’re not debating energy transition.

      We’re not debating scarcity narratives.

      We’re examining something deeper:

      When does the price mechanism stop working — and what does that mean for portfolio construction?

      Inside this issue:

      • Where Simon still works
      • Where the mechanism slows
      • Where it structurally fails
      • And how to allocate when constraint becomes time-based, not price-based

      Because in 2026, the edge is not identifying demand.

      It’s identifying where capital hits physical delay.

      Continue reading for the full allocator framework.

      Read More
      Sustainable energy project investment
      IRA Report To Smarter Investing
      Unlock the Opportunities of the Inflation Reduction Act!​ Are you ready to stay ahead in today's shifting economic landscape? Our comprehensive white paper breaks down the Inflation Reduction Act and reveals the key benefits, incentives, and strategies your business needs to capitalize on. Learn how to optimize your financial planning, leverage tax credits, and position your company for sustainable growth.
      Pre-order now to get the insights and actionable steps that can give your business a competitive edge.
      New Version Release Date: 12/10/2024
      Thank you! Your submission has been received!
      Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
      Close icon