HomeRight AerrowInsightsSepratorMacroMashupSeparator
Magnet Wars, Bitcoin Gravity & the New Rules of Trade
MacroMashup Newsletter

Magnet Wars, Bitcoin Gravity & the New Rules of Trade

Deals Everywhere. Supply Chains in Motion. Policy With a Price Tag.

Jul 18, 2025
Neil Winward

Author:

Neil Winward

|

Founder and CEO

of

Dakota Ridge Capital

Book a free energy consultation

here
    Magnet Wars, Bitcoin Gravity & the New Rules of Trade
    Get our weekly MacroMashup newsletters.
    Thank you! Your submission has been received!
    Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

    The U.S. is trying to do three hard things at once: rewire its industrial base, rewrite trade rules, and rethink money. This week’s cross‑currents—rare earth gambits, Bitcoin valuation models, crypto legislation, tariff math, and re-weaponized arms exports—are the real drivers of portfolios, not the noise.

    This Week at a Glance

    • Pentagon takes stake in MP Materials to jump‑start U.S. rare earth magnets.
    • Interior moves to loosen mining rules for lithium, cobalt, nickel.
    • Capriole’s “Bitcoin Energy Value” model gains institutional traction.
    • Crypto Week on Capitol Hill pushes stablecoin and jurisdiction bills forward.
    • Tariff revenue surges—the TACO trade is noisy, but the Treasury cash is real.
    • CPI mixed: headline edges up; core tame; tariff “leakage” shows in goods.
    • Arms‑via‑allies model channels U.S. kit to Ukraine while Europe foots more of the bill.

    MP Materials & the Pentagon’s Magnet Play

    MP Materials

    Washington is finally trying industrial policy on purpose. The U.S. is backing MP Materials to rebuild a domestic rare earth magnet supply chain—the crucial step between mined ore and finished neodymium‑praseodymium (NdPr) magnets that power EV drivetrains, wind turbines, precision munitions, and guidance systems.

    Deal Structure (proposed):

    • Pentagon equity stake: ~15%.
    • $150M low‑cost loan under Defense Production Act authority.
    • 10‑year offtake contract with a price floor tied to NdPr benchmarks.
    • Capacity goal: MP’s planned “10X Facility” targets 10,000 metric tons of finished magnets/yr by 2028—enough to move the U.S. from raw‑material exporter to full‑spectrum producer.

    Why Markets Care:
    This is economic statecraft, not subsidy trivia. A credible U.S. magnet supply reduces Chinese leverage across autos, wind, and defense—and could reprime valuations for miners, specialty processors, and defense primes with magnet exposure. China has played this long game for decades; the U.S. is late, but not out.

    Why Markets Care

    Doug Burgum’s Mining Offensive: Permitting as Policy

    Doug Burgum’s Mining Offensive

    Interior Secretary Doug Burgum is pushing an aggressive 20–30% cut in federal permitting timelines for strategic mineral projects on public lands.

    Focus metals: lithium, nickel, cobalt, rare earths—the feedstock for EV batteries, grid storage, munitions guidance, and permanent magnets.

    Framing: National security, not just climate. Burgum warns U.S. manufacturing plans are hostage to Chinese mineral supply chains.

    Pushback: Environmental coalitions already lining up lawsuits; Western water use and tribal consultation are friction points.

    Market Angle: Faster permits + DPA funding + offtake guarantees = a path for private capital to re‑rate U.S. critical‑mineral juniors now priced as option value only.

    Bitcoin’s “Energy Value” Gravity — Capriole’s Framework

    Bitcoin’s “Energy Value” Gravity

    Capriole Investments has gained Wall Street mindshare with its Bitcoin Energy Value (BEV) model—a fundamentals‑style anchor derived from energy input costs to secure the network relative to new BTC issuance.

    Current Model Read: ~$130K “fair value” equivalent. Spot trades below; long‑horizon funds are watching the gap.

    Why It Matters:

    • Post‑halving issuance declines; energy cost per new BTC rises.
    • Mining cost + issuance supply = quasi “marginal cost” floor for strategic allocators.
    • When spot trades deep below BEV, long‑only macro funds add; above, they trim.

    Investor Use Case: Less day‑trading signal, more valuation gravity—especially for institutions treating BTC as a commodity‑monetary hybrid.

    Investor Use Case

    Crypto Week on Capitol Hill: From Fringe to File Number

    Congressional hearing rooms actually said the quiet part out loud: digital assets need rules.

    In play:

    • GENIUS Act (stablecoins): Reserve, reporting, and charter framework advanced in committee.
    • Clarity Act: Attempts to fence the SEC’s “everything is a security” stance and carve out digital commodity treatment.
    • Anti‑CBDC Surveillance State Act: Symbolic, but signals resistance to a retail FedCoin.

    Several measures stalled, but the existence of coordinated hearings marks a regime shift: crypto policy is moving from enforcement to statute. Sentiment uplift helped push Bitcoin higher and broadened bid across large‑cap tokens.

    TACO Trump: Noise vs. The Treasury’s Tariff Cash

    TACO Trump

    Wall Street’s acronym TACO—“Trump Always Chickens Out”—still explains the trade: tariff threat, market wobble, deadline slide, risk‑on bounce. But the money is no joke.

    Tariff Revenue Reality

    • $113B collected YTD (2025) vs $61B YTD (2024).
    • June 2025: $26.6B vs $6.3B in June 2024.
    • New 25‑40% lines plus the 50% copper tariff are swelling customs receipts.

    Sector Effects:

    • U.S. miners and processors catch a pricing tailwind.
    • Import‑reliant manufacturers (electronics, autos, appliances) see margin pressure.
    • Treasury gains a quasi‑automatic stabilizer—tariff revenue now material to fiscal math.

    Trading Note: Markets fade the rhetoric—but earnings season will surface the cost pass‑through.

    CPI Check: Is Tariff Heat Showing Up?

    Latest read:

    • Headline CPI: +2.7% y/y (above consensus).
    • Core CPI (ex‑food/energy): +0.2% m/m (slightly cooler).
    • Category noise flagged in furnishings, toys, household appliances—channels where tariff passthrough tends to show first.

    Policy takeaway: Mixed data gives Powell room to wait. Tariff uncertainty + imperfect transmission lets the Fed stay higher‑for‑longer without new hikes.

    Ukraine Arms Deal: U.S. Kit, Europe’s Checkbook

    Washington has shifted to a “sell‑and-transfer” model: The U.S. sells advanced weapons—Patriot batteries, artillery, interceptors—to NATO partners, who in turn re‑route them to Ukraine.

    Why it works:

    • Sustains U.S. defense production lines.
    • Moves cost burden toward European budgets.
    • Keeps U.S. front‑line exposure indirect while replenishing allied inventories.

    Broader Implication: A template for future proxy support structures—in Asia as much as Eastern Europe.

    Macro Lens: Where All This Lands

    Industrial policy is finally married to national security. Rare earth magnets, mine permits, and energy security are now investable policy themes.

    Monetary & digital convergence: Bitcoin’s energy‑anchored valuation model is gaining institutional use just as Congress edges toward stablecoin law.

    Tariffs that “never happen” are funding the government. Ignore the tweet storms; follow the customs ledger.

    Portfolio Rule: Track the cash flows. Count the magnets. Price the copper. Watch the policy beta in your supply chains.

    In The Markets

    Tape & Headlines We’re Watching

    • “Epstein List” & Hunter-device controversies soaked airtime; markets ignored.
    • 10‑Year U.S. Treasury back near 4.5%.
    • PPI flat (0.0% m/m June) gives margin relief story.
    • Trump floated—and denied—firing Powell.
    • Indonesia trade deal adds LNG + nickel wrinkles.

    Enjoyed this newsletter? Get Involved.

    Help others learn, click to share
      Neil Winward

      Neil Winward is the founding partner of Dakota Ridge Captial, helping investors, developers, banks, non-profits, and family offices unlock massive tax savings - on average of 7%- 10% - via clean energy investments by fully leveraging U.S. government incentives such the Inflation Reduction Act.

      BOOK A CALL

      READY TO TAKE ACTION ON YOUR ENERGY PROJECT? BOOK A COMPLIMENTARY, ZERO-OBLIGATION CONSULTATION TO SEE HOW WE CAN HELP YOU.

      Book Here
      vectorvector
      The Queue: Where AI’s Grid Constraint Gets Real
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      The Queue: Where AI’s Grid Constraint Gets Real

      Neil Winward

      This week’s MacroMashup deep dive examines one of the least discussed datasets in macro markets: The US interconnection queue. More than 2,300 gigawatts of power generation are currently waiting to connect to the grid.

      MacroMashup Research Summary

      Core Thesis

      Markets are obsessed with AI chips.

      But the real constraint may be electricity.

      The US interconnection queue has become the chokepoint of American electricity expansion. Roughly 2,300 gigawatts of generation capacity are currently waiting to connect to a grid that operates at about 1,200 gigawatts today.

      Why It Matters

      AI infrastructure, electrification, and energy transition all depend on grid access. Interconnection delays now stretch three to six years in several regions, creating the first major bottleneck in the next wave of electricity demand.

      Key Data

      • 2,300 GW waiting in US interconnection queues. These projects include solar, wind, battery storage, natural gas, and other generation technologies.

      • Only ~13% of projects entering the queue ultimately complete

      • Median wait times approaching five years in several regions

      • Demand pressure ratios exceeding 5× in ERCOT

      Market Signals

      The queue is becoming a leading indicator for:

      • electricity price pressure

      • utility capex cycles

      • natural gas demand

      • regional AI infrastructure migration

      AI models scale at software speed.

      Electricity infrastructure expands at infrastructure speed.

      The Signal

      This Week’s Dashboard

      It’s all about the barrel.

      Oil dominated nearly every signal this week. Brent crude rallied from roughly $82 to $88, while WTI followed closely, settling near $85. The Strait of Hormuz remains the transmission mechanism: tanker transits have collapsed from roughly 24 per day to single digits since the conflict began, and every headline about the Strait is now moving assets across the macro dashboard.

      Gold was caught in the crossfire. When oil spikes, the dollar typically strengthens on safe-haven flows and higher yields raise the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Gold sold off from its late-February highs before stabilizing this week as the dollar softened again. Central bank buying remains the structural floor, but in the short term the dollar and the 10-year yield are driving the tape.

      The information war intensified as well. President Trump posted that the conflict was “very complete, pretty much.” Netanyahu responded with a new wave of strikes on Tehran. Iran apologized to the UAE after collateral damage from retaliatory drone strikes — and then continued launching them.

      At one point the White House deleted a social media post claiming the US Navy had escorted a tanker through the Strait of Hormuz after confirming no such escort had occurred. Oil briefly dropped on the headline before rebounding.

      Meanwhile the IEA proposed the largest strategic petroleum reserve release in its history. Pipeline alternatives are suddenly receiving attention, and the market is attempting to price the difference between a four-week war and a four-month one — a distinction worth tens of dollars per barrel.

      Equities barely reacted. The S&P finished the week essentially flat at ~6,781. Credit spreads widened modestly but remain far from pricing sustained economic damage.

      Either the market is right.

      Or it hasn’t caught up yet.

      But the most important constraint shaping the next phase of this cycle may not be geopolitical.

      It may be structural.

      Because the next phase of the global economy will run on electricity.

      The Real Constraint Behind the AI Boom

      Last week we introduced the idea that AI’s real constraint may not be software.

      It may be electricity.

      This intersection between AI infrastructure and electricity systems is becoming one of the most important macro stories of the next decade.

      are launching AI Grid Report, a new research publication focused on the intersection of AI infrastructure, electricity systems, and energy markets.

      The first issues will examine how the global AI buildout could reshape electricity demand, natural gas markets, and power infrastructure investment.

      If you’re interested in how the power grid may shape the next phase of the AI economy, you can preview the project here:

      https://open.substack.com/pub/theaigridreport

      The first issues will be launching soon.

      🔒 Deep Dive for Members

      Read More
      From Hormuz to the Grid: The Chokepoints That Matter
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      From Hormuz to the Grid: The Chokepoints That Matter

      Neil Winward

      Markets are modeling AI disruption at software speed. But electricity infrastructure may determine how fast the real economy can absorb it.

      Welcome to MacroMashup. We focus on constraints, not forecasts. Market structure, not vibes. Capital flows, leverage, and incentives—where things actually break.

      The week’s dominant story is geopolitical.

      U.S.–Israeli strikes on Iran. Retaliation spreading across the region. The Strait of Hormuz effectively closed. Markets scrambling to price the energy shock.

      But beneath the geopolitical noise, another question is taking shape as Anthropic and OpenAI wrestle with the Department of War over the role AI will play.

      The question is not whether AI can transform the economy and the battlefield—it already has— but how fast.

      Because AI runs on compute. And compute runs on power.

      The constraint shaping the next phase of the AI cycle may not be technological progress.

      It may be the infrastructure required to supply electricity fast enough.

      In this week’s MacroMashup deep dive, we examine:

      • why AI adoption may move at infrastructure speed rather than software speed

      • how grid constraints could shape the timeline of economic disruption

      • why energy infrastructure may become the leverage point of the AI economy

      A look at this week’s dashboard tells the story of which chokepoint is throttling harder.

      If you want to understand the structural constraints shaping global markets, join the MacroMashup community.

      Subscribe for weekly briefings examining the forces behind the next economic cycle.

      Read More
      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI

      Neil Winward

      Why capital misprices time-based energy constraints in the age of exponential compute.

      In 1980, Julian Simon made one of the most famous bets in economic history.

      He bet that human ingenuity would defeat scarcity.

      Paul Ehrlich bet the opposite.

      Simon won.

      Commodity prices fell.

      Technology advanced.

      Supply responded.

      The lesson became doctrine:

      When prices rise, markets fix shortages.

      That belief now underpins trillions of dollars in capital allocation.

      It also underpins the AI boom.

      But here’s the question investors are not asking:

      What happens when prices can’t fix the bottleneck?

      This week, we’re not debating AI.

      We’re not debating energy transition.

      We’re not debating scarcity narratives.

      We’re examining something deeper:

      When does the price mechanism stop working — and what does that mean for portfolio construction?

      Inside this issue:

      • Where Simon still works
      • Where the mechanism slows
      • Where it structurally fails
      • And how to allocate when constraint becomes time-based, not price-based

      Because in 2026, the edge is not identifying demand.

      It’s identifying where capital hits physical delay.

      Continue reading for the full allocator framework.

      Read More
      Sustainable energy project investment
      IRA Report To Smarter Investing
      Unlock the Opportunities of the Inflation Reduction Act!​ Are you ready to stay ahead in today's shifting economic landscape? Our comprehensive white paper breaks down the Inflation Reduction Act and reveals the key benefits, incentives, and strategies your business needs to capitalize on. Learn how to optimize your financial planning, leverage tax credits, and position your company for sustainable growth.
      Pre-order now to get the insights and actionable steps that can give your business a competitive edge.
      New Version Release Date: 12/10/2024
      Thank you! Your submission has been received!
      Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
      Close icon