Markets, Tariffs & Deals: Between Truce & Turmoil - What's Next?

The United States has quietly abandoned laissez-faire industrial policy. Through direct equity stakes, debt guarantees, and offtake control, the Pentagon is now operating a de facto venture capital portfolio spanning metals, energy, and critical supply chains. This MacroMashup deep dive examines the $ 7.4 Billion Tennessee smelter project as the centerpiece of a broader $20B(+) sovereign metals strategy — and explains why ownership of midstream infrastructure, not mines or markets, defines power in the next industrial age.

Welcome to MacroMashup — where geopolitics, capital flows, and real-world power intersect.

If you’re here, you already know the headlines miss the signal. Our goal is to map what matters before it becomes consensus.

What Happened Since the Last Edition

Before we dive into industrial policy, the macro landscape shifted — violently.

Venezuela’s regime collapse didn’t happen in a vacuum. Iran’s unrest didn’t fade organically. Gold didn’t hit $4,500 and silver didn’t test $80 by accident. And defense and AI infrastructure equities didn’t shrug off rate fears because markets suddenly got complacent.

These are not disconnected events.

They are symptoms of a deeper transition: resource control is back at the center of geopolitics — and it’s happening quietly.

This week’s MacroMashup connects those dots.

Economic data this week (ADP Employment Report for December) delivered a clean snapshot of a cooling but still expanding U.S. economy.

Where This Piece Goes Next

This article explores:

• Why the Pentagon is now running a venture-style capital portfolio
• How the $7.4B Tennessee smelter rewrites U.S. industrial doctrine
• Why smelting and refining — not mining — are the real choke points
• How equity ownership replaces sanctions and stockpiles
• Why this marks the end of naïve globalism in materials markets
• What this means for commodities, defense, and AI infrastructure investors

If you want the full framework — including deal mechanics, capital stacks, and macro implications — this is where the real work begins.

👉 Continue reading by upgrading to MacroMashup.

‍

The U.S. housing market is frozen not by prices, but by mortgage lock-in. Millions of homeowners are financially trapped by sub-4% mortgages, unable to move without forfeiting hundreds of thousands of dollars in purchasing power. This MacroMashup deep dive introduces residential defeasance — a long-standing commercial real estate tool — as a potential solution to unlock “ghost assets,” restore labor mobility, flood the market with inventory, and recapitalize the American middle class without rate cuts or taxpayer stimulus.

Welcome to MacroMashup — where we go past headlines and into the mechanics driving markets, policy, and capital flows.

If you care about why the economy behaves the way it does — not just what happened this week — you’re in the right place.

This week’s deep dive is exactly the kind of structural analysis MacroMashup is built for.

Subscribers receive:

• Weekly premium macro deep dives

• Structural frameworks for policy and capital shifts

• Early identification of second-order investment winners

• Clear explanations of complex financial plumbing

The economy is changing fastest in the places few people understand.

‍

Before we get to housing, let’s take a quick look at where we ended 2025.

2025 Macro Recap: Systems Over Narratives

The final numbers for 2025 are in, and the message is clear: Embrace systems and hard analysis; save the headlines for entertainment. This year proved that market narratives are often just noise designed to distract you from the structural trends that move the needle.

The “Bear Porn” Fallacy

If you succumbed to the “recession is imminent” bear porn narratives in April and stayed on the sidelines, you missed another solid year for equities. The S&P 500 delivered a 16.4% return, marking a rare “hat-trick” of three consecutive years with near-20% or better returns (24.2% in 2023 and 23.3% in 2024). Meanwhile, the tech-heavy NDX outpaced it with a 20.5% gain.

Hard Assets, Hard Data

Those who ignored the macro implications of persistent deficits and geopolitical friction missed a historic uptrend in precious metals. Silver was the champion of 2025, skyrocketing ~144%, while Gold finished up 65%—its strongest annual performance in decades. These weren’t speculative bets; they were systematic responses to a structural supply-demand imbalance and a global “debasement trade”.

The Bitcoin Reality Check

Finally, if you believed the narrative that 2025 was the year Bitcoin would accelerate into a new dimension, the charts taught you a difficult lesson. Despite a brief, high-octane run to all-time highs near $126,000 in October, the leading digital asset decoupled from the “everything rally” to end the year with a 6.4% decline. This highlights the danger of relying on “digital gold” narratives when the system itself—liquidity, leverage, and positioning—signals a different path.

What’s Going on with Housing?

The U.S. housing market looks strangely resilient.

Prices are still high.

Mortgage defaults are low.

Homeowners appear “wealthy” on paper.

And yet… almost nobody is moving.

This is usually explained as an affordability problem or blamed on “higher rates.” That explanation is convenient — and wrong.

What’s actually happening is more uncomfortable:

The American housing market is frozen because moving destroys private wealth.

Not a little.

Six figures.

Hidden inside millions of sub-4% mortgages is a financial asset most homeowners don’t know they own — and the moment they sell their home, that asset vanishes.

That disappearing value doesn’t show up in GDP.

It doesn’t show up in housing statistics.

But it quietly dictates behavior.

People stay put.

Jobs go unfilled.

Inventory dries up.

And policymakers keep pushing the wrong levers.

Here’s the contrarian part:

The housing crisis is not about prices, supply, or demand.

It’s about the forced destruction of a valuable financial contract.

This week on MacroMashup, we explore a question almost no one is asking:

What if a mortgage isn’t just debt — but an asset?

And what if the solution to the housing freeze already exists, hidden in plain sight, quietly used by professionals — just not households?

What We’re Diving Into This Week

This is where the overview ends — and the real work begins.

In the second half of this piece, we break down:

• Why millions of homeowners are sitting on a six-figure “ghost asset”

• The math behind why selling destroys purchasing power

• How commercial real estate already handles this problem

• Why lenders might actually prefer an alternative structure

• How this could restart housing mobility without stimulus or rate cuts

• Why this reframes the entire housing-policy debate

This isn’t a housing take.

It’s a capital-plumbing problem hiding inside plain English.

If you want the full argument — and the mechanics behind it — this is where you continue.

‍

👉 Upgrade to keep reading.

‍

‍

Welcome to MacroMashup—your weekly briefing on the real forces driving markets beneath the headlines. If you want disciplined macro analysis, portfolio frameworks, and real-world capital insights, subscribe to receive every deep dive.

2025 was the year the macro narrative stopped being theoretical and started reshaping portfolios.

Energy constraints became investment realities. AI’s infrastructure demands materialized. Geopolitical fragmentation stopped being a tail risk and became a structural feature. And the Federal Reserve’s familiar playbook proved far less effective than many expected.

But the most important development of 2025 wasn’t a single call or market move.

It was a shift in how markets respond.

Markets became less responsive to forecasts, guidance, and clean narratives — and more responsive to capacity, constraints, and balance-sheet realities. Investors who adjusted their mental models early felt calmer by year-end. Those who didn’t often felt increasingly reactive, even as information became more abundant.

This Annual Macro Brief is not a prediction for 2026.

It’s a reset.

It lays out what 2025 clarified, which assumptions quietly expired, and how investors should approach the year ahead with stronger orientation, better decision discipline, and fewer narrative-driven mistakes.

Why 2025 Was a Clarifying Year (Not a Volatile One)

Many investors will remember 2025 as noisy.

Rates moved. Markets chopped. Narratives rotated quickly. At times, it felt like nothing stuck long enough to trust.

That interpretation misses the point.

2025 wasn’t defined by instability. It was defined by disillusionment — the quiet removal of assumptions investors had been carrying forward from the prior decade.

Markets didn’t behave irrationally. They behaved selectively.

Some signals stopped working.

Some reassurance stopped landing.

Some explanations stopped producing follow-through.

What felt confusing was actually a sorting process.

Markets were clarifying what still matters, what matters less, and what no longer works at all.

What 2025 Made Clear (That Markets Now Price)

The most important lesson of 2025 wasn’t about growth or inflation levels.

It was about responsiveness.

Markets became less responsive to:

• Policy signaling
• Forward guidance
• Consensus optimism
• Clean narratives

And more responsive to:

• Capacity
• Constraints
• Balance-sheet realities
• Physical and political limits

This explains why “good news” often failed to extend rallies — and why “bad news” sometimes barely moved prices.

Three clarifications stood out.

First, inflation behavior mattered more than inflation prints.

Markets stopped reacting to month-to-month fluctuations and focused instead on persistence, stickiness, and second-order effects.

Second, policy intent mattered less than policy capacity.

What central banks wanted to do mattered less than what they could do without triggering unintended consequences.

Third, liquidity mattered more than narratives.

When liquidity tightened, markets became less forgiving regardless of the story attached to it.

Assets closer to the edge of the ‘circulatory system’—Bitcoin—suffered most.

None of this happened suddenly. Markets priced it quietly.

What 2025 Quietly Removed From the Investor Playbook

Some assumptions didn’t weaken in 2025. They expired.

One was the belief that liquidity backstops are automatic. Intervention now comes with trade-offs, delays, and political constraints.

Another was the idea that diversification always reduces risk. Correlations rose when it mattered most, and complexity often hid fragility rather than reducing it.

Perhaps most importantly, 2025 challenged the belief that waiting for clarity is a viable strategy. By the time clarity arrived, markets had often already moved.

These removals created discomfort — because they didn’t come with immediate replacements.

But those gaps also created opportunity for investors willing to update their frameworks.

The Five Dominant Macro Themes of 2025

1. The AI Energy Imperative: Power Became the Bottleneck

AI’s computational demands turned energy infrastructure into critical investment terrain. The winners weren’t just software companies — they were those controlling power generation, transmission, and reliability.

2025 takeaway: Energy stocks outperformed tech late in the year. Companies solving AI’s power problem gained pricing power.

2026 implication: The AI trade is now an energy trade.

2. The Death of the “Work” Metric

Traditional labor statistics broke down. Work continued. Productivity surged. Jobs disappeared from official measures.

Markets stopped reacting to employment prints and focused instead on margins, productivity, and automation.

2026 implication: Watch productivity, profit margins, and capex — not headline employment data.

3. The Commodity Reset

Commodities stopped acting like cyclical hedges and started behaving like structural growth assets.

Gold and silver reflected monetary debasement and central bank diversification. Copper, uranium, and critical minerals became national security issues.

2026 implication: Commodities belong in portfolios as growth positions, not just protection.

4. Geopolitical Fragmentation Accelerated

The post–Cold War order continued to unwind. Globalization gave way to regionalization. Supply-chain sovereignty became policy priority.

2026 implication: Favor regional resilience over global efficiency.

5. The K-Shaped Reality Deepened

Asset owners continued to win. Labor lagged. Scarce assets outperformed. Broad averages masked widening dispersion.

2026 implication: Quality, scarcity, and conviction matter more than broad exposure.

A Shift in How We Think About 2026

Before laying out actions, it’s worth addressing something directly.

The biggest upgrade heading into 2026 isn’t a new theme — it’s a new level of rigor in decision-making.

2025 reminded us of a simple truth: good outcomes don’t always mean good decisions, and bad outcomes don’t always mean bad ones.

That distinction matters.

Inspired by the principles outlined in Thinking in Bets (Annie Dukes), MacroMashup is placing greater emphasis on:

• Decision quality over outcome chasing
• Explicit recognition of uncertainty
• Bias awareness and probabilistic thinking
• Reviewing calls with discipline, not ego

The goal isn’t to sound more cautious. It’s to be more accountable.

That shift — toward clearer frameworks, stress-tested assumptions, and shared learning — is the foundation of what’s coming in 2026.

The Constraints That Define 2026

Entering 2026, markets are anchored to constraints that move slowly and matter deeply:

• Energy capacity remains a physical reality
• Debt and fiscal flexibility limit policy choices
• Labor and demographics cap growth potential
• Geopolitical fragmentation increases friction
• The cost of capital is no longer negligible

These aren’t forecasts. They’re boundaries.

Markets don’t debate them. They work around them.

2026 Action Plan: Five Moves for the Year Ahead

1. Build Energy Infrastructure Exposure

Natural gas midstream, nuclear, grid modernization, and AI-adjacent power infrastructure.

Why: AI’s energy demands are non-negotiable.

How: ~15–20% of growth allocation.

2. Increase Commodity Exposure Structurally

Gold, copper, uranium, and critical materials.

Why: Structural demand meets constrained supply.

How: Favor physical exposure and quality producers.

3. Focus on AI’s Second-Order Beneficiaries

Not Nvidia — but the companies serving Nvidia’s customers.

Why: Second-order effects are less crowded.

How: Automation, infrastructure, and productivity enablers.

4. Embrace the K-Shaped Reality

Scarce assets over broad exposure.

Why: Dispersion persists.

How: Concentration in highest-conviction positions.

5. Prepare for Shocks — Don’t Trade Them

Volatility will rise. Structural trends remain.

Why: Headlines exaggerate noise.

How: Maintain dry powder. Execute the plan.

What to Stop Doing in 2026

• Stop trading Fed announcements
• Stop chasing “cheap” value without structural support
• Stop diversifying for comfort rather than resilience
• Stop waiting for “normal” to return
  

Volatility is the baseline.

Macro Mashup: Deep-Dive Insights, Weekly

Macro Mashup is where we go deeper, every week.

It’s a weekly deep dive into the forces shaping markets right now — macroeconomics, energy, geopolitics, capital flows, and policy — with an emphasis on what actually matters versus what simply dominates headlines.

Subscribers receive:

• Weekly deep-dive analysis
  
• Clear frameworks to interpret current events
  
• Context that helps you avoid narrative-driven decisions

If you want to start the year oriented instead of reactive, this is the best place to begin.

macromashup.com

Already Reading Macro Mashup? Explore Fearless Investor

If you’re already subscribed to Macro Mashup, our sister publication, Fearless Investor, takes a complementary approach.

Fearless Investor focuses on:

• Portfolio strategy and allocation
• Behavioral finance and decision-making
• Practical systems and tools for DIY investors

It’s less about what’s happening out there — and more about how to structure decisions and portfolios in response.

Many readers follow both because together they cover:

• Macro context (Macro Mashup)
• Investor behavior, strategy, and systems (Fearless Investor)

If you haven’t explored Fearless Investor yet, it’s worth a look.

Continue reading here →

https://open.substack.com/pub/fearlessinvestor

Final Thought

2025 clarified something essential:

The old rules didn’t break overnight — they stopped compounding.

Energy determines AI winners.

Commodities determine energy winners.

Geopolitics determines access.

Automation determines survival.

The through-line is scarcity.

Your 2026 portfolio shouldn’t answer what you think will happen next.

It should answer what becomes more valuable as the world fragments, electrifies, and automates.

That’s where durable returns come from.

Get Involved

MacroMashup paid members receive full weekly deep dives, portfolio frameworks, and early access to investor-grade analysis. If you want to understand how liquidity, policy, and capital structure actually shape returns, subscribe today. 

macromashup.com 

Already subscribed? Enjoy this week’s deep dive!

‍

‍