HomeRight AerrowInsightsSepratorMacroMashupSeparator
Risk Is Back—But How Much Should You Be Taking?
MacroMashup Newsletter

Risk Is Back—But How Much Should You Be Taking?

One Big, Beautiful Bill With One Big, Ugly Price Tag

May 23, 2025
Neil Winward

Author:

Neil Winward

|

Founder and CEO

of

Dakota Ridge Capital

Book a free energy consultation

here
    Risk Is Back—But How Much Should You Be Taking?
    Get our weekly MacroMashup newsletters.
    Thank you! Your submission has been received!
    Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

    Trump’s tax play is here. And yes, it’s big, beautiful, and completely unaffordable.

    BREAKING NEWS: The House just passed the One Big, Beautiful Tax Bill—with last-minute concessions that rewrote the rules for clean energy investment. We at Dakota Ridge Capital are monitoring the situation closely and sending timely updates to our mailing list. Read more here.

    Key Provisions:

    • Middle-class relief: Expanded credits, lower rates for households under $200K
    • Business perks: R&D credits, full expensing, and factory-friendly deductions.
    • Infrastructure money: Roads, energy, digital upgrades.
    • Tariff buffer: Assistance for workers and industries exposed to global trade.
    • Retirement twist: MAGA accounts ($5,000/yr, with $1,000 seed for newborns).
    • Top tax rate stays at 37%—no reversion to 39.6%.
    • IRA trimmed, but not gutted.

    But the trade-off? A deficit surge.

    Markets love tax cuts. Bonds, not so much.

    Markets Turn Risk-On—But Bond Traders Aren’t Buying It

    Global growth is still slowing:

    • IMF, World Bank, and OECD all trimmed forecasts.
    • Global GDP for 2025: 2.3%—not keeping pace with inflation.
    • U.S. expected to grow 2.2%, EU just 1.1%, Eurozone a weak 0.9%.

    What changed? April 7 happened.

    • Stocks crashed, bonds buckled.
    • Gold soared. Bitcoin held.
    • The screen was red, and portfolios bled.
    • Tariff worries seeped into global trade forecasts.

    But since then…

    • Tariff ‘deals’ appeared quickly.
    • Equities rebounded fast.
    • Bonds? Still nervous.
    • MOVE index (bond volatility) spiked above 135—a level that triggers action from someone, somewhere

    Why the divergence?

    • U.S. debt issuance: ~$1T rolling over in 30 days
    • Credit downgrade.
    • Inflation still sticky, Fed still frozen.
    • Deficits projected to grow.

    Meanwhile, while stocks have been pulling capital from gold and silver, all three began to trade up together…until stocks got hit by a weak bond auction.

    Middle East Deals: Big Numbers, Bigger Implications

    The Gulf is betting on U.S. stability—with trillions.

    Defense

    • Saudi Arabia: $142B in U.S. defense contracts.
    • Qatar: $96B deal including Boeing’s largest aircraft order and $42B in weapons.

    Tech & AI

    • Saudi’s DataVolt to invest $20B in U.S. AI/data centers.
    • Google, Oracle, AMD, Salesforce, Uber: $80B in joint U.S.-Saudi initiatives.

    Energy & Infra

    • GE Vernova exporting $14.2B in gas turbines.
    • U.S. firms tapped to build airports, parks, entire cities in the Gulf.

    Financial & Real Estate

    • Qatar’s direct investment in the U.S. hit $3.3B in 2023—and growing.
    • Gulf sovereigns signal this is just the start.

    Investor Takeaway: Watch defense, tech, and infra stocks with MENA exposure.

    Still Unsure What To Do With Your Portfolio? Start Here.

    April 7 was a gut check. Remember how you felt?

    • Did you panic sell?
    • Dump everything into cash?
    • Swear off risk?
    • Or did you double down with a plan?

    Now that the dust has settled, ask:

    • Were your decisions signal-based—or emotion-based?
    • Were you following narratives, or following a system?
    investors behaviour

    The Case for Systems Over Sentiment

    What works:

    • A framework for identifying market regimes (growth, inflation, liquidity)
    • Macro factor tracking (yields, spreads, commodities)
    • Regime-based asset allocation rules
    • An overlay that adapts for momentum, volatility, and price

    There are many options—just don’t fly blind.

    In the Charts

    • S&P 500: Net positive YTD, despite the noise
    • 10-Year Treasury: Still elevated, still flashing caution.
    • Weak 20-year Treasury auction spooks bonds and weighs on stocks.
    • Gold vs. Bitcoin: Volatility gap narrowing—watch this pair.
    • USD: Direction unclear, but Treasury actions suggest soft-dollar bias.
    • Volatility in both stocks and bonds spiked during the tariff tantrum.
    • MOVE Index (bond equivalent of VIX): Spiked in April, now retreating, but still above comfort levels.
    • MOVE hitting 135 → alarm bells and some version of the cavalry arrives.
    • Lower volatility helped stocks rebound—why not bonds?
    • Elevated yields? Dealers going short ahead of the auction nudges the price down/yield up and locks in a profit.
    • Moody’s downgrade of the U.S. credit rating?
    • Big deficit worries—the One Big, Beautiful Tax Bill will not fix that.
    • Treasury market struggles show up in weak 20-year auction (mentioned 3x because…).

    Weekly Highlights

    We’re proud to share this in-depth feature in Clockwork’s latest blog: The Hidden Engine of Clean Energy.” Dive into how Dakota Ridge Capital is helping shape the future of renewables through innovative tax equity strategies.

    Watch or listen to Episode 4 of the MacroMashup podcast: featuring Manish Jain, CEO and Founder of Mezzi Wealth. If you’re looking for a way to take control of your investments, give it a listen. Manish and his team give you a fantastic tool to organize and understand your investment portfolio.

    Watch or listen to Dr. Pippa Malmgren on tariffs, power politics, and what the headlines aren’t saying.

    Enjoyed this newsletter? Get Involved.

    Help others learn, click to share
      Neil Winward

      Neil Winward is the founding partner of Dakota Ridge Captial, helping investors, developers, banks, non-profits, and family offices unlock massive tax savings - on average of 7%- 10% - via clean energy investments by fully leveraging U.S. government incentives such the Inflation Reduction Act.

      BOOK A CALL

      READY TO TAKE ACTION ON YOUR ENERGY PROJECT? BOOK A COMPLIMENTARY, ZERO-OBLIGATION CONSULTATION TO SEE HOW WE CAN HELP YOU.

      Book Here
      vectorvector
      The Queue: Where AI’s Grid Constraint Gets Real
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      The Queue: Where AI’s Grid Constraint Gets Real

      Neil Winward

      This week’s MacroMashup deep dive examines one of the least discussed datasets in macro markets: The US interconnection queue. More than 2,300 gigawatts of power generation are currently waiting to connect to the grid.

      MacroMashup Research Summary

      Core Thesis

      Markets are obsessed with AI chips.

      But the real constraint may be electricity.

      The US interconnection queue has become the chokepoint of American electricity expansion. Roughly 2,300 gigawatts of generation capacity are currently waiting to connect to a grid that operates at about 1,200 gigawatts today.

      Why It Matters

      AI infrastructure, electrification, and energy transition all depend on grid access. Interconnection delays now stretch three to six years in several regions, creating the first major bottleneck in the next wave of electricity demand.

      Key Data

      • 2,300 GW waiting in US interconnection queues. These projects include solar, wind, battery storage, natural gas, and other generation technologies.

      • Only ~13% of projects entering the queue ultimately complete

      • Median wait times approaching five years in several regions

      • Demand pressure ratios exceeding 5× in ERCOT

      Market Signals

      The queue is becoming a leading indicator for:

      • electricity price pressure

      • utility capex cycles

      • natural gas demand

      • regional AI infrastructure migration

      AI models scale at software speed.

      Electricity infrastructure expands at infrastructure speed.

      The Signal

      This Week’s Dashboard

      It’s all about the barrel.

      Oil dominated nearly every signal this week. Brent crude rallied from roughly $82 to $88, while WTI followed closely, settling near $85. The Strait of Hormuz remains the transmission mechanism: tanker transits have collapsed from roughly 24 per day to single digits since the conflict began, and every headline about the Strait is now moving assets across the macro dashboard.

      Gold was caught in the crossfire. When oil spikes, the dollar typically strengthens on safe-haven flows and higher yields raise the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Gold sold off from its late-February highs before stabilizing this week as the dollar softened again. Central bank buying remains the structural floor, but in the short term the dollar and the 10-year yield are driving the tape.

      The information war intensified as well. President Trump posted that the conflict was “very complete, pretty much.” Netanyahu responded with a new wave of strikes on Tehran. Iran apologized to the UAE after collateral damage from retaliatory drone strikes — and then continued launching them.

      At one point the White House deleted a social media post claiming the US Navy had escorted a tanker through the Strait of Hormuz after confirming no such escort had occurred. Oil briefly dropped on the headline before rebounding.

      Meanwhile the IEA proposed the largest strategic petroleum reserve release in its history. Pipeline alternatives are suddenly receiving attention, and the market is attempting to price the difference between a four-week war and a four-month one — a distinction worth tens of dollars per barrel.

      Equities barely reacted. The S&P finished the week essentially flat at ~6,781. Credit spreads widened modestly but remain far from pricing sustained economic damage.

      Either the market is right.

      Or it hasn’t caught up yet.

      But the most important constraint shaping the next phase of this cycle may not be geopolitical.

      It may be structural.

      Because the next phase of the global economy will run on electricity.

      The Real Constraint Behind the AI Boom

      Last week we introduced the idea that AI’s real constraint may not be software.

      It may be electricity.

      This intersection between AI infrastructure and electricity systems is becoming one of the most important macro stories of the next decade.

      are launching AI Grid Report, a new research publication focused on the intersection of AI infrastructure, electricity systems, and energy markets.

      The first issues will examine how the global AI buildout could reshape electricity demand, natural gas markets, and power infrastructure investment.

      If you’re interested in how the power grid may shape the next phase of the AI economy, you can preview the project here:

      https://open.substack.com/pub/theaigridreport

      The first issues will be launching soon.

      🔒 Deep Dive for Members

      Read More
      From Hormuz to the Grid: The Chokepoints That Matter
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      From Hormuz to the Grid: The Chokepoints That Matter

      Neil Winward

      Markets are modeling AI disruption at software speed. But electricity infrastructure may determine how fast the real economy can absorb it.

      Welcome to MacroMashup. We focus on constraints, not forecasts. Market structure, not vibes. Capital flows, leverage, and incentives—where things actually break.

      The week’s dominant story is geopolitical.

      U.S.–Israeli strikes on Iran. Retaliation spreading across the region. The Strait of Hormuz effectively closed. Markets scrambling to price the energy shock.

      But beneath the geopolitical noise, another question is taking shape as Anthropic and OpenAI wrestle with the Department of War over the role AI will play.

      The question is not whether AI can transform the economy and the battlefield—it already has— but how fast.

      Because AI runs on compute. And compute runs on power.

      The constraint shaping the next phase of the AI cycle may not be technological progress.

      It may be the infrastructure required to supply electricity fast enough.

      In this week’s MacroMashup deep dive, we examine:

      • why AI adoption may move at infrastructure speed rather than software speed

      • how grid constraints could shape the timeline of economic disruption

      • why energy infrastructure may become the leverage point of the AI economy

      A look at this week’s dashboard tells the story of which chokepoint is throttling harder.

      If you want to understand the structural constraints shaping global markets, join the MacroMashup community.

      Subscribe for weekly briefings examining the forces behind the next economic cycle.

      Read More
      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI

      Neil Winward

      Why capital misprices time-based energy constraints in the age of exponential compute.

      In 1980, Julian Simon made one of the most famous bets in economic history.

      He bet that human ingenuity would defeat scarcity.

      Paul Ehrlich bet the opposite.

      Simon won.

      Commodity prices fell.

      Technology advanced.

      Supply responded.

      The lesson became doctrine:

      When prices rise, markets fix shortages.

      That belief now underpins trillions of dollars in capital allocation.

      It also underpins the AI boom.

      But here’s the question investors are not asking:

      What happens when prices can’t fix the bottleneck?

      This week, we’re not debating AI.

      We’re not debating energy transition.

      We’re not debating scarcity narratives.

      We’re examining something deeper:

      When does the price mechanism stop working — and what does that mean for portfolio construction?

      Inside this issue:

      • Where Simon still works
      • Where the mechanism slows
      • Where it structurally fails
      • And how to allocate when constraint becomes time-based, not price-based

      Because in 2026, the edge is not identifying demand.

      It’s identifying where capital hits physical delay.

      Continue reading for the full allocator framework.

      Read More
      Sustainable energy project investment
      IRA Report To Smarter Investing
      Unlock the Opportunities of the Inflation Reduction Act!​ Are you ready to stay ahead in today's shifting economic landscape? Our comprehensive white paper breaks down the Inflation Reduction Act and reveals the key benefits, incentives, and strategies your business needs to capitalize on. Learn how to optimize your financial planning, leverage tax credits, and position your company for sustainable growth.
      Pre-order now to get the insights and actionable steps that can give your business a competitive edge.
      New Version Release Date: 12/10/2024
      Thank you! Your submission has been received!
      Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
      Close icon