HomeRight AerrowInsightsSepratorMacroMashupSeparator
The Summer Market Mirage: Safe, or Seconds from a Shock?
MacroMashup Newsletter

The Summer Market Mirage: Safe, or Seconds from a Shock?

Jun 13, 2025
Neil Winward

Author:

Neil Winward

|

Founder and CEO

of

Dakota Ridge Capital

Book a free energy consultation

here
    The Summer Market Mirage: Safe, or Seconds from a Shock?
    Get our weekly MacroMashup newsletters.
    Thank you! Your submission has been received!
    Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

    Policy Paralysis or Calm Before the Storm? Markets Watch the Senate, Warily

    Washington’s back in session and markets couldn’t be more bored. The Senate’s version of the One Big, Beautiful Bill trades blunt force for precision, thanks in part to Parliamentarian McDonough’s “Byrd Bath” rules, which require every provision to speak strictly to budget reconciliation. Her rulings may ultimately shape the bill more than party leaders themselves.

    Senate Priorities Amid Los Angeles Unrest

    With thousands of National Guard troops and Marines deployed to quell nationwide protests in Los Angeles sparked by aggressive federal ICE raids, the Senate is fast-tracking two controversial measures in the reconciliation framework:

    • Medicaid for undocumented immigrants is being stripped from the package—cleanly excised under pressure to align the bill with budget reconciliation rules.
    • ICE recruiter incentives are heading in the opposite direction: U.S. agents will receive $10,000 bonuses for meeting enforcement targets—an effort to bolster staffing amid rising political unrest.

    Clean Energy in Limbo: Senate Holds the Balance

    Clean Energy in Limbo: Senate Holds the Balance

    The clean-energy portion of the One Big Beautiful Bill hangs by a thread as the Senate prepares its version. The House’s version would sharply curtail key Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) credits—pulling IRA clean-credits like 45Y and 48E unless projects begin construction in 60 days and are completed by 2028, while slashing residential and tech-neutral incentives.

    That rollback triggered swift backlash: bipartisan senators led by Utah’s John Curtis are urging relief—advocating phased timelines, credit transferability, and preserving support for nuclear and geothermal—even as fossil-fuel friendly Republicans push methane fee reductions.

    Major tech players (Microsoft, Google, AWS, Meta) are lobbying to save clean-power credits critical for AI data centers. Meanwhile, over 175 mayors and local leaders cautioned the Senate that axing these incentives could jeopardize jobs, raise energy costs, and stall $14 bn in projects already planned.

    Bottom line: Without Senate amendments—targeting start-date flexibility, rescued transferability, and maybe foreign-entity sourcing fixes—the clean-energy agenda risks collapse. And that means more policy paralysis, not progress.

    Empire Wind Approved—Pipelines Quietly Resurface

    In a quiet but telling trade-off, New York Governor Kathy Hochul has signed off on the long-delayed Empire Wind offshore project—a major win for clean energy advocates. But in the background, two previously blocked natural gas pipelines—Constitution and NESE—are now quietly advancing through state permitting channels.

    Neither Albany nor Washington is calling it a deal, but the sequencing tells the story: offshore wind moves forward, and fossil fuel infrastructure gets a second wind.

    The takeaway: In U.S. infrastructure, progress doesn’t always follow market signals—but political symmetry gets results.

    U.S.–China Trade Talks Pivot to Swaps Over Sanctions

    U.S.–China Trade Talks Pivot to Swaps Over Sanctions

    In a sharp departure from the tariff wars of years past, Washington and Beijing are quietly crafting a resource-for-access deal:

    • China needs U.S. ethane to fuel its petrochemical and plastics industries.
    • The U.S. needs Chinese rare earths for electric vehicles, wind turbines, and advanced defense systems.

    The contours of the deal:

    • China resumes rare earths exports.
    • The U.S. loosens select chip and equipment controls.
    • Visa restrictions for Chinese students and researchers ease.
    • Beijing steps up enforcement on fentanyl precursor production.

    The only thing missing? Signatures from Xi and Trump.

    Markets aren’t waiting—they’re pricing in détente, not disruption.

    A Shifting Global Order: Welcome to the Age of Monsters

    Antonio Gramsci once warned, “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born. Now is the time of monsters.”

    That moment may be here.

    • Multilaterals like the IMF, World Bank, UN, and WTO are losing authority as geopolitical fractures deepen.
    • Globalism is in retreat, replaced by nationalist trade policies and mercantilist rhetoric.
    • Populist waves are reshaping leadership across Europe and the U.S.
    • Central banks face creeping fiscal dominance, their independence tested as deficits balloon and political pressure mounts.

    The investor takeaway: This is no longer a market that responds to earnings or inflation prints alone. It’s a market reacting to regime change—political, monetary, and structural. Adapt accordingly.

    Market Takeaways: Stay Nimble, Avoid the Crossfire

    Amid rising volatility and political noise, the smartest play may be to sidestep the ideological battles and focus on positioning:

    • U.S. equities still anchor economic growth and help close the fiscal gap via capital gains and retirement distributions.
    • Gold and Bitcoin are beneficiaries of dollar weakness and tightening liquidity.
    • Precious metals offer asymmetric upside during regime shifts.
    • And beware: Bearish narratives are often monetized—fueling trading volumes, subscriptions, and fear-based positioning.

    As the main character, Gordon Gekko, famously said in the 1980s movie, Wall Street:

    “If you want a friend, get a dog.” And remember, you don’t need to outrun the bear—just the guy behind you.

    Credit: HBO

    Central Banks Under Scrutiny: William White’s Warning

    A former central banker himself, William White pulls no punches:

    1. Inflation targeting is a slow leak, not a precise tool
    2. Debt addiction has governments hooked on easy money
    3. Models won’t save us—economies don’t operate like machines
    4. Quantitative easing is akin to sugar—good short-term, bad long-term
    5. Next step? Fed and other central banks must stay hawkish while urging fiscal stimulus—politicians must carry the fiscal torch

    Market Update: Resilience in the Midst of Noise

    Market Update
    • Stocks shrugged off early turbulence—cleared within weeks.
    • Bond volatility (MOVE) and VIX spiked briefly, now calmed.
    • Silver held firm—watch for:
      1. Sustained $35–$40+ range.
      2. Potential short squeeze.
      3. High premium on physical supply.
    • Even Tesla rebounded from its X/IPO spat.

    Reality check: Many bearish narratives serve brokerage and hedge fund fee revenue. But fundamentals? Strong balance sheets, low unemployment, business deregulation, and decent policy offsets suggest recession risks remain distant.

    Narrative Busting

    • CPI fell below expectations this week.
    • Bond auctions— showing less stress: $120 billion priced in 3, 10 and 30-year at lower rates than pre-market.
    • Tariffs: once inflationary, now increasingly benign.
    • Rate cuts from Powell? Markets are virtually unanimous: “No” next week.

    Final Word

    Markets may be in a summer lull—but beneath the surface, tectonic shifts are underway. If you’re not navigating fiscal and political regime change with intent, you’re drifting. 

    MacroMashup’s mission is to help you cut through the haze so you feel informed and confident about your investment decisions. 

    Want to take even more control? Join our Fearless Investor Community launching in Summer 2025 here: https://neil-winward.kit.com/community 

    Help others learn, click to share
      Neil Winward

      Neil Winward is the founding partner of Dakota Ridge Captial, helping investors, developers, banks, non-profits, and family offices unlock massive tax savings - on average of 7%- 10% - via clean energy investments by fully leveraging U.S. government incentives such the Inflation Reduction Act.

      BOOK A CALL

      READY TO TAKE ACTION ON YOUR ENERGY PROJECT? BOOK A COMPLIMENTARY, ZERO-OBLIGATION CONSULTATION TO SEE HOW WE CAN HELP YOU.

      Book Here
      vectorvector
      The Queue: Where AI’s Grid Constraint Gets Real
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      The Queue: Where AI’s Grid Constraint Gets Real

      Neil Winward

      This week’s MacroMashup deep dive examines one of the least discussed datasets in macro markets: The US interconnection queue. More than 2,300 gigawatts of power generation are currently waiting to connect to the grid.

      MacroMashup Research Summary

      Core Thesis

      Markets are obsessed with AI chips.

      But the real constraint may be electricity.

      The US interconnection queue has become the chokepoint of American electricity expansion. Roughly 2,300 gigawatts of generation capacity are currently waiting to connect to a grid that operates at about 1,200 gigawatts today.

      Why It Matters

      AI infrastructure, electrification, and energy transition all depend on grid access. Interconnection delays now stretch three to six years in several regions, creating the first major bottleneck in the next wave of electricity demand.

      Key Data

      • 2,300 GW waiting in US interconnection queues. These projects include solar, wind, battery storage, natural gas, and other generation technologies.

      • Only ~13% of projects entering the queue ultimately complete

      • Median wait times approaching five years in several regions

      • Demand pressure ratios exceeding 5× in ERCOT

      Market Signals

      The queue is becoming a leading indicator for:

      • electricity price pressure

      • utility capex cycles

      • natural gas demand

      • regional AI infrastructure migration

      AI models scale at software speed.

      Electricity infrastructure expands at infrastructure speed.

      The Signal

      This Week’s Dashboard

      It’s all about the barrel.

      Oil dominated nearly every signal this week. Brent crude rallied from roughly $82 to $88, while WTI followed closely, settling near $85. The Strait of Hormuz remains the transmission mechanism: tanker transits have collapsed from roughly 24 per day to single digits since the conflict began, and every headline about the Strait is now moving assets across the macro dashboard.

      Gold was caught in the crossfire. When oil spikes, the dollar typically strengthens on safe-haven flows and higher yields raise the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Gold sold off from its late-February highs before stabilizing this week as the dollar softened again. Central bank buying remains the structural floor, but in the short term the dollar and the 10-year yield are driving the tape.

      The information war intensified as well. President Trump posted that the conflict was “very complete, pretty much.” Netanyahu responded with a new wave of strikes on Tehran. Iran apologized to the UAE after collateral damage from retaliatory drone strikes — and then continued launching them.

      At one point the White House deleted a social media post claiming the US Navy had escorted a tanker through the Strait of Hormuz after confirming no such escort had occurred. Oil briefly dropped on the headline before rebounding.

      Meanwhile the IEA proposed the largest strategic petroleum reserve release in its history. Pipeline alternatives are suddenly receiving attention, and the market is attempting to price the difference between a four-week war and a four-month one — a distinction worth tens of dollars per barrel.

      Equities barely reacted. The S&P finished the week essentially flat at ~6,781. Credit spreads widened modestly but remain far from pricing sustained economic damage.

      Either the market is right.

      Or it hasn’t caught up yet.

      But the most important constraint shaping the next phase of this cycle may not be geopolitical.

      It may be structural.

      Because the next phase of the global economy will run on electricity.

      The Real Constraint Behind the AI Boom

      Last week we introduced the idea that AI’s real constraint may not be software.

      It may be electricity.

      This intersection between AI infrastructure and electricity systems is becoming one of the most important macro stories of the next decade.

      are launching AI Grid Report, a new research publication focused on the intersection of AI infrastructure, electricity systems, and energy markets.

      The first issues will examine how the global AI buildout could reshape electricity demand, natural gas markets, and power infrastructure investment.

      If you’re interested in how the power grid may shape the next phase of the AI economy, you can preview the project here:

      https://open.substack.com/pub/theaigridreport

      The first issues will be launching soon.

      🔒 Deep Dive for Members

      Read More
      From Hormuz to the Grid: The Chokepoints That Matter
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      From Hormuz to the Grid: The Chokepoints That Matter

      Neil Winward

      Markets are modeling AI disruption at software speed. But electricity infrastructure may determine how fast the real economy can absorb it.

      Welcome to MacroMashup. We focus on constraints, not forecasts. Market structure, not vibes. Capital flows, leverage, and incentives—where things actually break.

      The week’s dominant story is geopolitical.

      U.S.–Israeli strikes on Iran. Retaliation spreading across the region. The Strait of Hormuz effectively closed. Markets scrambling to price the energy shock.

      But beneath the geopolitical noise, another question is taking shape as Anthropic and OpenAI wrestle with the Department of War over the role AI will play.

      The question is not whether AI can transform the economy and the battlefield—it already has— but how fast.

      Because AI runs on compute. And compute runs on power.

      The constraint shaping the next phase of the AI cycle may not be technological progress.

      It may be the infrastructure required to supply electricity fast enough.

      In this week’s MacroMashup deep dive, we examine:

      • why AI adoption may move at infrastructure speed rather than software speed

      • how grid constraints could shape the timeline of economic disruption

      • why energy infrastructure may become the leverage point of the AI economy

      A look at this week’s dashboard tells the story of which chokepoint is throttling harder.

      If you want to understand the structural constraints shaping global markets, join the MacroMashup community.

      Subscribe for weekly briefings examining the forces behind the next economic cycle.

      Read More
      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI
      MacroMashup Newsletter
      3

      When the Price Mechanism Breaks: What the Simon–Ehrlich Bet Gets Wrong About AI

      Neil Winward

      Why capital misprices time-based energy constraints in the age of exponential compute.

      In 1980, Julian Simon made one of the most famous bets in economic history.

      He bet that human ingenuity would defeat scarcity.

      Paul Ehrlich bet the opposite.

      Simon won.

      Commodity prices fell.

      Technology advanced.

      Supply responded.

      The lesson became doctrine:

      When prices rise, markets fix shortages.

      That belief now underpins trillions of dollars in capital allocation.

      It also underpins the AI boom.

      But here’s the question investors are not asking:

      What happens when prices can’t fix the bottleneck?

      This week, we’re not debating AI.

      We’re not debating energy transition.

      We’re not debating scarcity narratives.

      We’re examining something deeper:

      When does the price mechanism stop working — and what does that mean for portfolio construction?

      Inside this issue:

      • Where Simon still works
      • Where the mechanism slows
      • Where it structurally fails
      • And how to allocate when constraint becomes time-based, not price-based

      Because in 2026, the edge is not identifying demand.

      It’s identifying where capital hits physical delay.

      Continue reading for the full allocator framework.

      Read More
      Sustainable energy project investment
      IRA Report To Smarter Investing
      Unlock the Opportunities of the Inflation Reduction Act!​ Are you ready to stay ahead in today's shifting economic landscape? Our comprehensive white paper breaks down the Inflation Reduction Act and reveals the key benefits, incentives, and strategies your business needs to capitalize on. Learn how to optimize your financial planning, leverage tax credits, and position your company for sustainable growth.
      Pre-order now to get the insights and actionable steps that can give your business a competitive edge.
      New Version Release Date: 12/10/2024
      Thank you! Your submission has been received!
      Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
      Close icon