The Mirage of Trading the Headlines: Why Geopolitics Is a Portfolio Hazard

Don't trade the tape
Israel–Iran War Headlines: Great for Clicks, Lousy for Timing
- Israel’s formal declaration of war on Iran and Washington’s call for Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” have lit up every newsfeed.
- Oil and the dollar jumped as expected—but Treasuries didn’t rally; yields rose on inflation fears. Equities dipped, then refocused on the Fed. Gold popped, then faded into the FOMC meeting. Bitcoin merely coughed.

Bottom line: Most of the “news” was priced in before retail investors could act. History shows knee-jerk trades in geopolitics are usually wrong-footed.
Why Geopolitics Feels Tradable—and Usually Isn’t

Investor rule: Watch, don’t chase. The S&P 500 typically recovers within six months of major geopolitical events.
Portfolio Discipline > “Fast Money”

- Binary outcomes, unknown timing, sentiment whiplash: the odds are stacked against headline traders.
- Missing the rebound is costlier than riding out a drawdown. A handful of big up-days drives most long-term equity returns.
Instead:
- Rebalance, harvest tax losses, stick to process.
- Never be afraid to sell winners because you fear taxes, but sell in non-taxable accounts to rebalance if possible.
- Diversify across assets that don’t move in lockstep—and stop watching every tick.
Fed Day: Powell’s Tightrope
- Dot plot says “higher for longer,” but the market still prices two cuts starting in September.
- Soft retail sales and CPI argue for easing; $75 oil argues against.
- Powell, in a potential final year, doesn’t want to be Arthur Burns or Paul Volcker.
- New Fed chair nomination being discussed.
- Candidate will likely support a higher inflation target—maybe 3%—and be open to lower rates.
Trade idea: Stay neutral duration (i.e., don’t structure your portfolio to bet on a rise or fall in rates); use options to express views around the September FOMC (so you just lose premium if you’re wrong).
Submarines vs. the Grid: The Labour Shortage No One Priced
- Pentagon may scrap a Virginia-class sub sale to Australia because it can’t find enough welders—those workers are needed to harden the U.S. power grid.
- Coding won’t fix a welding shortfall; chronic skilled-trade gaps are the new supply-chain risk.
- These are the “big moves” worth watching for shaping strategy.
Senate Tweaks to the “One Big Beautiful Bill”
- Still in flux, but early language paring back House's sledgehammer.
- Tighter construction deadlines for qualifying projects
- Sunset clauses that could eliminate certain credits by 2028
- Rollback of tech-neutral clean energy support, including nuclear and geothermal, for foreign-related entity involvement
- Carve-outs for energy storage
- Quick sunset of credit support for hydrogen and EV vehicles and chargers
- And a controversial 10-year ban on state-level AI regulations, tied to funding
- Senate softened the House bill in some ways, tightened it in others (45Z— extended eligibility period but no negative emissions rate)
- Lots of room to negotiate still, but the path is narrowing.
Another take. I am ambivalent about Alex Epstein because he is a little too convinced and a lot strident:

Market Tape

MacroMashup Playbook
- Resilience over reaction – Stick to strategic weights; trim into strength, add on overshoots.
- Watch skilled-labor bottlenecks – They’re the next supply-chain inflation driver.
- Geopolitics ≠ Investment Thesis – Use it for risk scenarios, not trade triggers.
Enjoyed this newsletter? Get Involved.
- Subscribe to MacroMashup: one email a week, zero noise.
- Book a call with Dakota Ridge Capital if you’re investing in clean energy or want to optimize for tax strategy
- Watch us on YouTube, or tune in via Spotify / Apple
- Collaborate with us at contact@macromashup.com
📤 Enjoyed this? Share it via LinkedIn, repost on X → here, or forward it via email.