Is China the Villain in World Trade? Depends Who You Ask

Markets have already priced next week’s rate cut, reducing the December meeting to a procedural event. The surprise is political rather than monetary. Donald Trump has telegraphed that he has selected Jerome Powell’s successor and will announce the new chair early next year. Investors are trading under two regimes at once: the Fed we have, and the Fed about to arrive.

That transition matters. It introduces fresh uncertainty into term premia at a time when markets had hoped for clarity and stability. With the policy anchor shifting, asset leadership is starting to rearrange itself.

Gold and silver are the first to reflect the drift. Both metals are breaking higher as investors hedge the possibility that real yields will not return to their pre-pandemic ranges. Bitcoin, despite its “hard money” narrative, has trailed metals and equities throughout 2025. In a year where geopolitical and policy risks dominate, assets with sovereign and central-bank sponsorship continue to outperform instruments that rely on sentiment or brand identity for support.

Inside equities, the AI narrative is broadening. Google and Amazon are amplifying investments in custom silicon, reducing Nvidia’s dominance and creating a more distributed hardware ecosystem. The era of AI as a single-ticker trade is ending. As money cheapens and capex accelerates, the economics of who controls compute—and the energy required to run it—becomes a macro factor rather than a niche technical variable.

Geopolitical risk remains a muted but persistent backdrop. The war in Ukraine continues with no clear endgame. Markets have partially priced it out, but it still shapes defense spending, energy flows, and Western political cohesion. None of this is peripheral; together, these dynamics form a single regime shift rather than disconnected storylines.

The through-line is that the cloud is becoming physical.

Compute is migrating from an abstract idea to a resource-heavy system of power lines, land, cooling, and policy. The market is beginning to price the shift from software narratives to the infrastructure that fuels them.

This Week’s Deep Dive

The full deep dive examines how these forces converge in a real project: a giga-scale, multi-fuel energy–compute campus—and why it illustrates the investment architecture behind a potential 2.5x clean-energy opportunity. To access the complete analysis and investor notes, become a paid subscriber for only $0.30 per day. If you’re not quite ready for that, remember you can try the 7-day free trial.

‍

‍

Markets ended the short week in a strange state of desperate optimism: assets drifted higher, volatility flickered, and everyone tried to pretend that the macro cracks widening underneath the surface were simply “holiday noise.” They weren’t.

Across Bitcoin, metals, equities, and policy, the tape told one story: a system pulling apart in two directions, exactly like the economy itself.

Bitcoin: Stuck in Neutral

Bitcoin spent the week trapped in the high-80s, unable to break out, unable to break down.

Bulls call the range resilience.

Bears call it exhaustion.

Both are right.

The digital-gold narrative has stalled. Bitcoin is behaving like an asset waiting for a macro catalyst big enough to justify direction. Until then: sideways, with noise.

Precious Metals: Quiet Accumulation, Rising Pressure

Gold and silver continue consolidating at higher levels. They’re not breaking out, but they’re not giving up ground either.

Driving forces:

• real rates wobbling

• central bank accumulation

• retail investors quietly buying insurance

• rising geopolitical uncertainty

This is classic coiled-spring behavior. Metals are building pressure, not losing it.

S&P 500: A Split Personality Markets Don’t Want to Acknowledge

On the surface, the index looks fine. Underneath, dispersion borders on schizophrenic.

Nvidia is the poster child.

After blowing out earnings, the stock spiked nearly 4 percent to 193, then immediately became a battlefield.

• Over 100,000 contracts traded at the 200 strike in a single morning

• Implied volatility collapsed by more than half

• Traders aggressively sold calls

• Price swings hit six to eight dollars per day

Record revenues and guidance on one side; options-driven churn on the other. Nvidia isn’t trading like a stock. It’s trading like a volatility event.

The broader index hides this dynamic, but the internals scream: fragile momentum.

Geopolitics: Diplomacy on a Tightrope

Several stories converged:

• Ukraine accepted a U.S.-brokered peace framework “in principle,” with Russian acceptance unresolved

• The White House previewed an ACA extension to blunt premium spikes ahead of 2026

• Supreme Court tariff rulings added another layer of economic risk

• Energy markets reacted to rising tension in the Middle East and Taiwan

Each headline nudged markets, but none brought clarity. They simply added more noise to an already conflicted backdrop.

Policy: The Fed Is in Open Disagreement

If the market was hoping for certainty, the Federal Reserve delivered the opposite.

• The street wants a rate cut

• Inflation remains too sticky

• Jobs data is weakening

• Consumer sentiment is deteriorating

• Fed governors are openly contradicting one another

December no longer feels like a routine policy meeting. It feels like a political knife-fight happening in public.

The central bank is divided, the narrative is fractured, and markets can sense it.

Investor Mood: Cross-Currents, Not Consensus

Some traders are still clinging to the soft-landing narrative.

Others are piling into gold, cash, short duration, and defensive flows.

Volatility spikes, fades, reappears.

Every time a Fed voice speaks, the bid shifts.

There is no unified market psychology. Only cross-currents.

Bottom Line of the Free Section

Markets are drifting not because conditions are stable, but because no single narrative has enough conviction to dominate.

Bitcoin stuck.

Gold coiled.

Equities split.

Policy chaotic.

Geopolitics unresolved.

This is not a market preparing for collapse.

It’s a market preparing for redistribution — of capital, of opportunity, of risk.

And that brings us to the real story.

‍

Subscribe to MacroMashup to unlock this full analysis

Artificial intelligence is accelerating the largest surge in electricity demand in modern American history. Data centers are being built faster than utilities can deliver power to them, and the grid was never designed for this speed or scale of load growth. Everything from national energy security to regional pricing and global technology competition will be shaped by how the United States responds in the next two to five years.

Most investors are still focused on AI models, software, and chipmakers. These are important, but they are not where the most asymmetric opportunity will come from. The deeper truth is that the next decade will be defined by the energy systems that power AI, not the AI companies themselves. The real opportunity is forming at the infrastructure layer.

In the full version of this analysis, I cover the specific regions where grid failure risk is rising, the companies that are best positioned to benefit from the AI driven power buildout, the indicators investors should monitor to stay ahead of the curve, and the policy signals that will determine the winners and losers of this new cycle.

To continue reading, become a MacroMashup subscriber.

Subscribe to MacroMashup to unlock this full analysis

‍

No spam. No promotions.

Only high-quality macro insights from MacroMashup that help you understand where the world is moving and how to position your portfolio.

‍